From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965895AbXG3BVA (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:21:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965626AbXG3BUw (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:20:52 -0400 Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.238]:40690 "EHLO nz-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965624AbXG3BUr (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 21:20:47 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Mb6m7KwGQOSkGKRqJCyr4cc1i7lpRKXxx5hQC2r/97aqfCR5faFudGMbKoKm3nI1axNEydfadtvCnQ+OkL1fGVhXFu44ZXdAky7+osQGGF9YQlI1Mua+tX0O6OVfc9Ml1eWX8h5Tc6wBqJ7bBLFbklcm8jKzjlsAqtlOkonTDo8= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 11:20:46 +1000 From: "Matthew Hawkins" To: John Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) Cc: "Ingo Molnar" , ck@vds.kolivas.org, "Kasper Sandberg" , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" In-Reply-To: <930f95dc0707291431j4e50214di3c01cd44b5597502@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1185536610.502.8.camel@localhost> <20070729170641.GA26220@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291154j102494d9m58f4cc452c7ff17c@mail.gmail.com> <20070729204716.GB1578@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291431j4e50214di3c01cd44b5597502@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/30/07, John wrote: > I understand that, I was just wondering if the FPS scales the same natively > vs. Wine as I typically only run native games. I have been hesitant to move > over to CFS due to reports of 3D issues and wanted to see if you had numbers > in regards to CFS vs. SD. John, the numbers Ingo makes and the numbers you make will no doubt be different (unless by some fantastic freak of nature you both have identical systems). Take this opportunity to do this testing yourself so in case there is some improvement to make, it can be done for 2.6.23. Nobody can benchmark your system but you. Remember to set CONFIG_HZ to 1000 -- Matt