From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967261AbXGaDHp (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:07:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965949AbXGaDHd (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:07:33 -0400 Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.198.184]:19914 "EHLO rv-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965745AbXGaDHb (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 23:07:31 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EW5Olgn+NnRVPzZc/+WZkJWSte2Z2Htg18xC+4eXWtt2ESn/B8XoMlvgJqrPMk9lBlqIoXqsmea3W8Gl1ABU9cBAmYgUIm99pxDYDoX3z7g2uSD8MZ6BmWHpQ3Y3/RYCZRTspkTG1tGK9uNe2lN1CWHMwFBF11oJT9Lj+0rbcgY= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:07:30 +1000 From: "Matthew Hawkins" To: "Roland Dreier" Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ? Cc: "Christoph Hellwig" , "Jacob Braun" , kriko , ck@vds.kolivas.org, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , linux-mm@kvack.org, "Martin Schwidefsky" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <930f95dc0707291154j102494d9m58f4cc452c7ff17c@mail.gmail.com> <20070729204716.GB1578@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291431j4e50214di3c01cd44b5597502@mail.gmail.com> <20070730114649.GB19186@elte.hu> <20070730182959.GA29151@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/31/07, Roland Dreier wrote: > > Fuck you Martin! > > I think you meant to yell at Matthew, not Martin ;) What's amusing about this is he's yelling at me for something I didn't do, can't even get my name right, and has the audacity to claim that *I* am the one looking like a fool! While we're descending into primary school theatrics, may I just say "takes one to know one" ;-) I took the time to track down what caused a breakage - in an "illegal binary driver" (not against the law here, though defamation certainly is...) no less. And contacted the vendor (separately). Other people on desktop machines with an ATI card using the fglrx driver may have been interested to know that they can't do the benchmarking some people here on lkml and -mm are asking for with a current 2.6.23 git kernel, hence my post. Martin's cleanup patch is good and I never claimed otherwise, I just said the comment on the commit was a bad call (as there are users of that interface). Certainly ATI should fix their dodgy drivers. That's been the cry of the community for a long time... -- Matt