From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932436AbWFGWJd (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 18:09:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932439AbWFGWJd (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 18:09:33 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.187]:57056 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932436AbWFGWJc (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2006 18:09:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DYvNxgHtJdcGT5FckuTJ+H/3k/J+YYrdQUvIsSBEUTJvT1ZWoDqnsH7/4EgmiCFZiGrZQrJHxS67diV2SK53l1FJnqhLiJ+6re3JuD/g+c/UBFGArQZosy869G56aRB6QsO3PB045mmbWjmIF3fcGQ0cGW7QHspWClJaipDdFkA= Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 15:09:31 -0700 From: "Dan Carpenter" To: "Bill Rugolsky Jr." , "Matt Heler" , "Jeff Garzik" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH][INCOMPLETE] sata_nv: merge ADMA support In-Reply-To: <20060327160845.GG9411@ti64.telemetry-investments.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060317232339.GA5674@ti64.telemetry-investments.com> <20060319232317.GA25578@ti64.telemetry-investments.com> <441F56AD.8020001@garzik.org> <200603262014.35466.lkml@lpbproductions.com> <20060327160845.GG9411@ti64.telemetry-investments.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote: > Here is an incomplete attempt to get the sata_nv ADMA code working. > > I made another pass through my merge of the sata_nv driver to fix and > clean up a few things. I've only made the minimal changes necessary > to get it into a testable state; methinks it could do with a lot of > refactoring and cleanup, instead of all the "if (host->...host_type == ADMA)" tests. > Did you ever figure this out? It looks like you're mixing two completely seperate bugs. The ata timeouts and the lost ticks messages. > BIOS Information > Vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. > Version: 2004Q3 > Release Date: 10/12/2005 > This is causing the sata failures: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190856 Downgrade to match your other system (version 1.01). That will fix the ata timeouts at least. I'm still interested in the lost ticks messages though... regards, dan carpenter