From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
<amistry@google.com>,
Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<zhangjinhao2@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf record: Fix continue profiling after draining the buffer
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:19:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b28a2b0d-99a0-88e3-873d-9963640a6fdd@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YD+8r/KiCJmnoJ/f@kernel.org>
On 2021/3/4 0:43, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:31:51AM +0800, Yang Jihong escreveu:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 2021/2/19 1:09, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>>> Em Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:20:53AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>>>> Em Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 11:46:12AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 07:35:22PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 3:50 PM Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> commit da231338ec9c098707c8a1e4d8a50e2400e2fe17 uses eventfd to solve rare race
>>>>>>> where the setting and checking of 'done' which add done_fd to pollfd.
>>>>>>> When draining buffer, revents of done_fd is 0 and evlist__filter_pollfd
>>>>>>> function returns a non-zero value.
>>>>>>> As a result, perf record does not stop profiling.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following simple scenarios can trigger this condition:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sleep 10 &
>>>>>>> perf record -p $!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> After the sleep process exits, perf record should stop profiling and exit.
>>>>>>> However, perf record keeps running.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If pollfd revents contains only POLLERR or POLLHUP,
>>>>>>> perf record indicates that buffer is draining and need to stop profiling.
>>>>>>> Use fdarray_flag__nonfilterable to set done eventfd to nonfilterable objects,
>>>>>>> so that evlist__filter_pollfd does not filter and check done eventfd.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fixes: da231338ec9c (perf record: Use an eventfd to wakeup when done)
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@huawei.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 2 +-
>>>>>>> tools/perf/util/evlist.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>>>>> tools/perf/util/evlist.h | 4 ++++
>>>>>>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>>>>>> index fd3911650612..51e593e896ea 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
>>>>>>> @@ -1663,7 +1663,7 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
>>>>>>> status = -1;
>>>>>>> goto out_delete_session;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>> - err = evlist__add_pollfd(rec->evlist, done_fd);
>>>>>>> + err = evlist__add_wakeup_eventfd(rec->evlist, done_fd);
>>>>>>> if (err < 0) {
>>>>>>> pr_err("Failed to add wakeup eventfd to poll list\n");
>>>>>>> status = err;
>>>>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
>>>>>>> index 05363a7247c4..fea4c1e8010d 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evlist.c
>>>>>>> @@ -572,6 +572,14 @@ int evlist__filter_pollfd(struct evlist *evlist, short revents_and_mask)
>>>>>>> return perf_evlist__filter_pollfd(&evlist->core, revents_and_mask);
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +#ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
>>>>>>> +int evlist__add_wakeup_eventfd(struct evlist *evlist, int fd)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + return perf_evlist__add_pollfd(&evlist->core, fd, NULL, POLLIN,
>>>>>>> + fdarray_flag__nonfilterable);
>>>>>>> +}
>>>>>>> +#endif
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does it build when HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT is not defined?
>>>>>
>>>>> yea, I was wondering the same.. but it's called only from
>>>>> code within HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT ifdef
>>>>
>>>> Yes, this can't work on systems without eventfd, it will simply not
>>>> build, and why do we have to make the definition of this function
>>>> conditional on HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT?
>>>>
>>>> I'm missing something :-\
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, this whole call to evlist__add_pollfd is already surrounded by
>>>> #ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT:
>>>>
>>>> 1656 if (zstd_init(&session->zstd_data, rec->opts.comp_level) < 0) {
>>>> 1657 pr_err("Compression initialization failed.\n");
>>>> 1658 return -1;
>>>> 1659 }
>>>> 1660 #ifdef HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
>>>> 1661 done_fd = eventfd(0, EFD_NONBLOCK);
>>>> 1662 if (done_fd < 0) {
>>>> 1663 pr_err("Failed to create wakeup eventfd, error: %m\n");
>>>> 1664 status = -1;
>>>> 1665 goto out_delete_session;
>>>> 1666 }
>>>> 1667 err = evlist__add_pollfd(rec->evlist, done_fd);
>>>> 1668 if (err < 0) {
>>>> 1669 pr_err("Failed to add wakeup eventfd to poll list\n");
>>>> 1670 status = err;
>>>> 1671 goto out_delete_session;
>>>> 1672 }
>>>> 1673 #endif // HAVE_EVENTFD_SUPPORT
>>>> 1674
>>>> 1675 session->header.env.comp_type = PERF_COMP_ZSTD;
>>>> 1676 session->header.env.comp_level = rec->opts.comp_level;
>>>>
>>>> Jiri, does your Acked-by stands? Namhyung?
>>>
>>> Thanks tested and applied, together with Jiri's Tested-by,
>>>
>>> - Arnaldo
>>> .
>>>
>> Is this patch okay? Is there anything that needs to be modified?
>
> It was merged:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/tools/perf/builtin-record.c?id=e16c2ce7c5ed5de881066c1fd10ba5c09af69559
>
> - Arnaldo
> .
> Thanks.
Yang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-05 6:50 Yang Jihong
2021-02-05 10:35 ` Namhyung Kim
2021-02-05 10:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-02-07 0:56 ` Yang Jihong
2021-02-18 10:18 ` Yang Jihong
2021-02-18 13:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-18 17:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-22 1:31 ` Yang Jihong
2021-03-03 16:43 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-03-04 1:19 ` Yang Jihong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b28a2b0d-99a0-88e3-873d-9963640a6fdd@huawei.com \
--to=yangjihong1@huawei.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=amistry@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=zhangjinhao2@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®