mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Olaf van der Spek" <olafvdspek@gmail.com>
To: "Davide Libenzi" <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: epoll behaviour after running out of descriptors
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2008 23:17:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2cc26e40811021417o38f9b171ka669961d93b9025c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0811021258250.9451@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>

On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
>> Wouldn't the port space require about 20+ k connects? This issue
>> happens after 1 k.
>
> The reason for "When accept returns EMFILE, I call epoll_wait and accept
> and it returns with another EMFILE." is because your sockets-close logic
> is broken.

It's not broken, it's designed that way. It's designed to hit the
descriptor limit and then close all sockets some time after.

> You get an event for the listening fd, you go call accept(2)
> and in one or two passes you fill up the avail fd space, then you go back
> calling epoll_wait(), and yet back to accept(2). This w/out triggering the
> file-close-relief code (yes, you fill up 1K fds *before* 30 seconds). Of
> course you get another EMFILE.

The second EMFILE doesn't make sense, epoll_wait shouldn't signal the
socket as ready again, right?

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-02 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-01 16:38 Olaf van der Spek
2008-11-02 18:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-02 18:33   ` Olaf van der Spek
2008-11-02 18:48     ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-02 18:51       ` Olaf van der Spek
2008-11-02 19:10         ` Eric Dumazet
2008-11-02 19:15           ` Olaf van der Spek
2008-11-02 19:17         ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-02 19:20           ` Olaf van der Spek
2008-11-02 19:27             ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-02 20:41               ` Olaf van der Spek
2008-11-02 21:17                 ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-02 22:17                   ` Olaf van der Spek [this message]
2008-11-02 22:49                     ` Davide Libenzi
2008-11-03  8:07                       ` Olaf van der Spek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2cc26e40811021417o38f9b171ka669961d93b9025c@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=olafvdspek@gmail.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®