mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Justin Lai <justinlai0215@realtek.com>
To: Yang Zi <2959243019@qq.com>, Larry Chiu <larry.chiu@realtek.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "andrew+netdev@lunn.ch" <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net: rtase: Fix NULL pointer dereference in NAPI cleanup on probe failure
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 07:13:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2e37853a4634b3b8810283580b6d393@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_AFD4DC7BE2EC61C628B53A3BCF4B558C2105@qq.com>

Yang Zi <2959243019@qq.com> wrote:
> 
> External mail : This email originated from outside the organization. Do not
> reply, click links, or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and
> know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> 
> rtase_init_napi() (which adds the NAPI contexts and sets napi->dev) is
> called after rtase_alloc_interrupt().  If interrupt allocation fails,
> rtase_init_one() jumps to err_out_del_napi and calls netif_napi_del() on
> NAPI contexts that were never added, so napi->dev is still NULL.
> netif_napi_del() -> __netif_napi_del() -> netdev_lock(napi->dev)
> dereferences that NULL pointer.
> 
> KASAN report:
> 
>     BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in __mutex_lock_common
> kernel/locking/mutex.c:625 [inline]
>     BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in __mutex_lock+0x8f/0xce0
> kernel/locking/mutex.c:820
>     Read of size 8 at addr 0000000000000cd8 by task syz.0.1/1147
> 
>     __mutex_lock+0x8f/0xce0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:820
>     netdev_lock include/linux/netdevice.h:2818 [inline] [rtase]
>     __netif_napi_del include/linux/netdevice.h:2942 [inline] [rtase]
>     netif_napi_del include/linux/netdevice.h:2961 [inline] [rtase]
>     rtase_init_one+0x5c3d/0x5fd0
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c:2295 [rtase]
> 
> Only call netif_napi_del() on NAPI contexts that were actually added
> (napi->dev != NULL), so the interrupt-allocation failure path skips them
> while the post-napi-init failure paths still remove them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zi <2959243019@qq.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> index e3cd4f7c1380..b4d8828ca87d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/rtase/rtase_main.c
> @@ -2493,9 +2493,14 @@ static int rtase_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>      }
> 
>  err_out_del_napi:
> +    /* rtase_init_napi() runs after rtase_alloc_interrupt(); if interrupt
> +     * allocation failed the NAPI contexts were never added and napi->dev
> is
> +     * still NULL, so netif_napi_del() must not be called on them.
> +     */
>      for (i = 0; i < tp->int_nums; i++) {
>          ivec = &tp->int_vector[i];
> -        netif_napi_del(&ivec->napi);
> +        if (ivec->napi.dev)
> +            netif_napi_del(&ivec->napi);
>      }
> 
>  err_out_release_board:

Thanks for the patch.
 
Since rtase_init_napi() is only called after
rtase_alloc_interrupt() succeeds, I think the interrupt allocation
failure path can simply jump to err_out_release_board instead of
checking napi->dev in the NAPI cleanup path. The
err_out_del_napi label can then be removed.
 
Justin

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-25  9:02 Yang Zi
2026-09-01  7:13 ` Justin Lai [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2e37853a4634b3b8810283580b6d393@realtek.com \
    --to=justinlai0215@realtek.com \
    --cc=2959243019@qq.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=larry.chiu@realtek.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®