mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chetan Loke <chetanloke@gmail.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: Irq architecture for multi-core network driver.
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:08:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2f3590f0912161408u73947f6fx6902ebef927caf94@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AE0DB98.1000101@caviumnetworks.com>

>>
>> Does your hardware do flow-based queues?  In this model you have
>> multiple rx queues and the hardware hashes incoming packets to a single
>> queue based on the addresses, ports, etc. This ensures that all the
>> packets of a single connection always get processed in the order they
>> arrived at the net device.
>>
>
> Indeed, this is exactly what we have.
>
>
>> Typically in this model you have as many interrupts as queues
>> (presumably 16 in your case).  Each queue is assigned an interrupt and
>> that interrupt is affined to a single core.
>

> Certainly this is one mode of operation that should be supported, but I
> would also like to be able to go for raw throughput and have as many cores
> as possible reading from a single queue (like I currently have).
>
Well, you could let the NIC firmware(f/w) handle this. The f/w would
know which interrupt was just injected recently.In other words it
would have a history of which CPU's would be available. So if some
previously interrupted CPU isn't making good progress then the
firmware should route the incoming response packets to a different
queue. This way some other CPU will pick it up.


> David Daney
> --
Chetan Loke

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-12-16 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-22 21:40 David Daney
2009-10-22 22:05 ` Chris Friesen
2009-10-22 22:24   ` David Daney
2009-10-23  7:59     ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-23 17:28       ` Jesse Brandeburg
2009-10-23 23:22         ` Eric W. Biederman
2009-10-24 13:26           ` David Miller
2009-10-24  3:19         ` David Miller
2009-10-24 13:23     ` David Miller
2009-12-16 22:08     ` Chetan Loke [this message]
2009-12-16 22:30       ` David Daney
2009-12-16 23:00         ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-12-16 23:26           ` David Daney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2f3590f0912161408u73947f6fx6902ebef927caf94@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=chetanloke@gmail.com \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®