From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
vivien.didelot@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
georg.waibel@sensor-technik.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 11/22] net: dsa: Allow drivers to modulate between presence and absence of tagging
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:17:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2f505f2-0dd4-c0c7-89d1-fb9ddd040708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190410005700.31582-12-olteanv@gmail.com>
On 4/9/2019 5:56 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Frames get processed by DSA and redirected to switch port net devices
> based on the ETH_P_XDSA multiplexed packet_type handler found by the
> network stack when calling eth_type_trans().
>
> The running assumption is that once the DSA .rcv function is called, DSA
> is always able to decode the switch tag in order to change the skb->dev
> from its master.
>
> However there are tagging protocols (such as the new
> DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105) where this assumption is not completely true,
> since switch tagging piggybacks on the absence of a vlan_filtering
> bridge.
>
> Having DSA receive untagged traffic would put it in an impossible
> situation: the eth_type_trans() function would invoke the DSA .rcv(),
> which could not change skb->dev, then eth_type_trans() would be invoked
> again, which again would call the DSA .rcv, and the packet would never
> be able to exit the DSA filter and would spiral in a loop until the
> whole system dies.
>
> This happens because eth_type_trans() doesn't actually look at the skb
> (so as to identify a potential tag) when it deems it as being
> ETH_P_XDSA. It just checks whether skb->dev has a DSA private pointer
> installed (therefore it's a DSA master) and that there exists a .rcv
> callback (everybody except DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE has that). This is
> understandable as there are many switch tags out there, and exhaustively
> checking for all of them is far from ideal.
>
> The solution lies in the observation that a more nuanced check can be
> made when eth_type_trans() determines that switch tagging is used or
> not. In a way, this reverts patch "717ffbfb28ac net: dsa: remove
> dsa_uses_tagged_protocol", but instead of adding it back as a DSA
> function, it is now a boolean property. This is because the driver might
> actually know better when it can and can't support switch tagging.
>
> With this patch, all tagging protocols can morph at runtime into the
> DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE on receive, by setting cpu_dp->uses_tag_protocol = 0.
> This permits them to at least terminate traffic through the master net
> device. Their .rcv callback no longer even gets called in this mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
> ---
[snip]
> + /* Property used to allow traffic at runtime to bypass the DSA
> + * filter in eth_type_trans and be processed as regular on the
> + * master net device.
> + */
> + bool uses_tag_protocol;
This gets used in the hot path can you make sure this is part of the
first cache line of a dsa_port? pahole is a good tool for determining
where a member is in a given structure. With that:
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-10 2:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 0:56 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/22] NXP SJA1105 DSA driver Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/22] lib: Add support for generic packing operations Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/22] net: dsa: Fix pharse -> phase typo Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 1:57 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 03/22] net: dsa: Store vlan_filtering as a property of dsa_port Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/22] net: dsa: mt7530: Use vlan_filtering property from dsa_port Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 1:57 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/22] net: dsa: Add more convenient functions for installing port VLANs Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 2:01 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-04-10 20:15 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/22] net: dsa: Call driver's setup callback after setting up its switchdev notifier Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/22] ether: Add dedicated Ethertype for pseudo-802.1Q DSA tagging Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 2:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-04-10 21:31 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/22] net: dsa: Optional VLAN-based port separation for switches without tagging Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/22] net: dsa: Be aware of switches where VLAN filtering is a global setting Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 10/22] net: dsa: b53: Let DSA handle mismatched VLAN filtering settings Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 11/22] net: dsa: Allow drivers to modulate between presence and absence of tagging Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 2:17 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2019-04-10 21:52 ` Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 12/22] net: dsa: Introduce driver for NXP SJA1105 5-port L2 switch Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 13/22] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for FDB and MDB management Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 14/22] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for VLAN operations Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 15/22] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for ethtool port counters Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 16/22] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for traffic through standalone ports Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 17/22] net: dsa: sja1105: Add support for Spanning Tree Protocol Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 18/22] net: dsa: sja1105: Error out if RGMII delays are requested in DT Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 2:15 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 19/22] net: dsa: sja1105: Prevent PHY jabbering during switch reset Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 20/22] net: dsa: sja1105: Reject unsupported link modes for AN Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 2:09 ` Florian Fainelli
2019-04-10 0:56 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 21/22] Documentation: networking: dsa: Add details about NXP SJA1105 driver Vladimir Oltean
2019-04-10 0:57 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 22/22] dt-bindings: net: dsa: Add documentation for " Vladimir Oltean
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b2f505f2-0dd4-c0c7-89d1-fb9ddd040708@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=georg.waibel@sensor-technik.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®