mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: ZhangHui <zhanghui31@xiaomi.com>,
	James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.co,
	peter.wang@mediatek.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org,
	huangjianan@xiaomi.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: core: fix bus timeout in ufshcd_wl_resume flow
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 18:41:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2fbe277-2819-4af4-9b36-b7407618cbf6@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240813134729.284583-1-zhanghui31@xiaomi.com>

On 8/13/24 6:47 AM, ZhangHui wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index 5e3c67e96956..e5e3e0277d43 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -3291,6 +3291,8 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>   	struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
>   	int err;
>   
> +	if (hba->ufshcd_reg_state == UFSHCD_REG_RESET)
> +		return -EBUSY;
>   	/* Protects use of hba->reserved_slot. */
>   	lockdep_assert_held(&hba->dev_cmd.lock);

Does this change make ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd() unpredictable - it succeeds
if the controller is in the normal state and fails if error recovery
is ongoing? If so, which code paths does this affect and/or break?

Additionally, I think the above check is racy. hba->ufshcd_reg_state may
change after the above code checked it and before ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd()
has finished. Wouldn't it be better to make code that shouldn't be
executed while the error handler is ongoing wait until error handling
has finished?

Thanks,

Bart.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-14  1:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-13 13:47 ZhangHui
2024-08-14  1:41 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-08-15 13:07   ` [External Mail]Re: " 章辉
2024-08-14  6:39 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-08-15 13:14   ` [External Mail]Re: " 章辉

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b2fbe277-2819-4af4-9b36-b7407618cbf6@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.co \
    --cc=huangjianan@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=zhanghui31@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®