From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<cohuck@redhat.com>, <cai@lca.pw>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] vfio-pci: Invalidate mmaps and block MMIO access on disabled memory
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 17:46:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b30fdc87-31e7-cb45-dab3-c37322ce05b1@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526003705.GK744@ziepe.ca>
On 2020-05-25 17:37, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
...
>> commit 318b275fbca1ab9ec0862de71420e0e92c3d1aa7
>> Author: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
>> Date: Tue Mar 22 16:30:51 2011 -0700
>>
>> mm: allow GUP to fail instead of waiting on a page
>>
>> GUP user may want to try to acquire a reference to a page if it is already
>> in memory, but not if IO, to bring it in, is needed. For example KVM may
>> tell vcpu to schedule another guest process if current one is trying to
>> access swapped out page. Meanwhile, the page will be swapped in and the
>> guest process, that depends on it, will be able to run again.
>>
>> This patch adds FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT (suggested by Linus) and
>> FOLL_NOWAIT follow_page flags. FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT, when used in
>> conjunction with VM_FAULT_ALLOW_RETRY, indicates to handle_mm_fault that
>> it shouldn't drop mmap_sem and wait on a page, but return VM_FAULT_RETRY
>> instead.
>
> So, from kvm's perspective it was to avoid excessively long blocking in
> common paths when it could rejoin the completed IO by somehow waiting
> on a page itself?
Or perhaps some variation on that, such as just retrying with an intervening
schedule() call. It's not clear just from that commit.
>
> It all seems like it should not be used unless the page is going to go
> to IO?
That's my conclusion so far, yes.
>
> Certainly there is no reason to optimize the fringe case of vfio
> sleeping if there is and incorrect concurrnent attempt to disable the
> a BAR.
Definitely agree with that position.
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>> index 8429d5aa31e44..e32e8e52a57ac 100644
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>> @@ -430,6 +430,15 @@ extern pgprot_t protection_map[16];
>> * continuous faults with flags (b). We should always try to detect pending
>> * signals before a retry to make sure the continuous page faults can still be
>> * interrupted if necessary.
>> + *
>> + * About @FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT: this is intended for callers who would like
>> + * to acquire a page, but only if the page is already in memory. If, on the
>> + * other hand, the page requires IO in order to bring it into memory, then fault
>> + * handlers will immediately return VM_FAULT_RETRY ("don't wait"), while leaving
>> + * mmap_lock held ("don't drop mmap_lock"). For example, this is useful for
>> + * virtual machines that have multiple guests running: if guest A attempts
>> + * get_user_pages() on a swapped out page, another guest can be scheduled while
>> + * waiting for IO to swap in guest A's page.
>> */
>> #define FAULT_FLAG_WRITE 0x01
>> #define FAULT_FLAG_MKWRITE 0x02
>
> It seems reasonable but people might complain about the kvm
> specifics of the explanation.
>
> It might be better to explain how the caller is supposed to know when
> it is OK to try GUP again and expect success, as it seems to me this
> is really about externalizing the sleep for page wait?
>
OK, good point. The example was helpful in the commit log, but not quite
appropriate in mm.h, yes.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-26 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-22 19:17 [PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-pci: Block user access to disabled device MMIO Alex Williamson
2020-05-22 19:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] vfio/type1: Support faulting PFNMAP vmas Alex Williamson
2020-05-22 19:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] vfio-pci: Fault mmaps to enable vma tracking Alex Williamson
2020-05-22 19:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] vfio-pci: Invalidate mmaps and block MMIO access on disabled memory Alex Williamson
2020-05-23 19:34 ` Peter Xu
2020-05-23 23:06 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-23 23:52 ` Peter Xu
2020-05-24 0:02 ` Peter Xu
2020-05-25 12:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 14:28 ` Peter Xu
2020-05-25 14:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 15:11 ` Peter Xu
2020-05-25 16:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-25 20:56 ` John Hubbard
2020-05-26 0:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-26 0:46 ` John Hubbard [this message]
2020-05-26 13:49 ` Peter Xu
2020-05-26 14:32 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-26 14:46 ` Peter Xu
2020-05-26 15:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-26 15:57 ` Alex Williamson
2020-05-22 22:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] vfio-pci: Block user access to disabled device MMIO Qian Cai
2020-05-22 22:25 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b30fdc87-31e7-cb45-dab3-c37322ce05b1@nvidia.com \
--to=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®