Re: [PATCH v2 -next] Input: gpio_keys: set input direction explicitly for gpio keys

[Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>]

On 16/11/16 18:34, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 05:42:15PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16/11/16 17:36, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:42:14PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>> Commit 700a38b27eef ("Input: gpio_keys - switch to using generic device
>>>> properties") switched to use generic device properties for GPIO keys and
>>>> commit 5feeca3c1e39 ("Input: gpio_keys - add support for GPIO descriptors")
>>>> switched from legacy GPIO numbers to GPIO descriptors.
>>>>
>>>> Previously devm_gpio_request_one was explicitly passed GPIOF_DIR_IN flag
>>>> to set the GPIO direction as input. However devm_get_gpiod_from_child
>>>> doesn't have such provisions and hence fwnode_get_named_gpiod can't set
>>>> it as input.
>>>>
>>>> This breaks few platforms with the following error:
>>>> " gpiochip_lock_as_irq: tried to flag a GPIO set as output for IRQ
>>>>  unable to lock HW IRQ <n> for IRQ
>>>>  genirq: Failed to request resources for POWER (irq <x>) on irqchip
>>>>  gpio_keys: Unable to claim irq <x>; error -22
>>>>  gpio-keys: probe failed with error -22 "
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes the issue by setting input direction explicitly for
>>>> gpio input keys. It also remove the existing GPIOF_DIR_IN flag setting
>>>> for the legacy gpios and merges into single gpiod_direction_input call.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 700a38b27eef ("Input: gpio_keys - switch to using generic device properties")
>>>> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
>>>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
>>>> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys.c        | 5 ++++-
>>>> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c | 5 ++++-
>>>> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>> 	- Fix the build(had sent a wrong version by accident)
>>>>
>>>> Hi Dmitry,
>>>>
>>>> The other option would be to pass the flag explicitly and add support to
>>>> handle it in the path devm_get_gpiod_from_child would take.
>>>
>>> Hi Sudeep,
>>>
>>> No, I think explicitly configuring it for input is good (at least for
>>> now), but we need error handling.
>>>
>>
>> Sure, a quick glance makes me think: all I need is to return the error
>> as everything is handled by devm_* APIs. If so I will respin with that
>> change, otherwise please let me know if I am missing anything here.
>
> No, I think that is it.
>

Thanks for the confirmation, fixed and sent v3.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep