mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SEV: Track SNP launch state and disallow invalid userspace interactions
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 20:12:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b31f7c6e-2807-4662-bcdd-eea2c1e132fa@fortanix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d98692e2-d96b-4c36-8089-4bc1e5cc3d57@fortanix.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5213 bytes --]

On 2026-01-19 20:06, Jethro Beekman wrote:
> Calling any of the SNP_LAUNCH_ ioctls after SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH results in a
> kernel page fault due to RMP violation. Track SNP launch state and exit early.
> 
> vCPUs created after SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH won't have a guest VMSA automatically
> created during SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH by converting the kernel-allocated VMSA. Don't
> allocate a VMSA page, so that the vCPU is in a state similar to what it would
> be after SNP AP destroy. This ensures pre_sev_run() prevents the vCPU from
> running even if userspace makes the vCPU runnable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jethro Beekman <jethro@fortanix.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index f59c65abe3cf..cdaca10b8773 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -2205,6 +2205,9 @@ static int snp_launch_start(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>  	if (!sev_snp_guest(kvm))
>  		return -ENOTTY;
>  
> +	if (sev->snp_finished)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	if (copy_from_user(&params, u64_to_user_ptr(argp->data), sizeof(params)))
>  		return -EFAULT;
>  
> @@ -2369,7 +2372,7 @@ static int snp_launch_update(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>  	void __user *src;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (!sev_snp_guest(kvm) || !sev->snp_context)
> +	if (!sev_snp_guest(kvm) || !sev->snp_context || sev->snp_finished)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (copy_from_user(&params, u64_to_user_ptr(argp->data), sizeof(params)))
> @@ -2502,7 +2505,7 @@ static int snp_launch_finish(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>  	if (!sev_snp_guest(kvm))
>  		return -ENOTTY;
>  
> -	if (!sev->snp_context)
> +	if (!sev->snp_context || sev->snp_finished)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
>  	if (copy_from_user(&params, u64_to_user_ptr(argp->data), sizeof(params)))
> @@ -2548,13 +2551,15 @@ static int snp_launch_finish(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>  	data->gctx_paddr = __psp_pa(sev->snp_context);
>  	ret = sev_issue_cmd(kvm, SEV_CMD_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH, data, &argp->error);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Now that there will be no more SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE ioctls, private pages
> -	 * can be given to the guest simply by marking the RMP entry as private.
> -	 * This can happen on first access and also with KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY.
> -	 */
> -	if (!ret)
> +	if (!ret) {
> +		sev->snp_finished = true;
> +		/*
> +		 * Now that there will be no more SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE ioctls, private pages
> +		 * can be given to the guest simply by marking the RMP entry as private.
> +		 * This can happen on first access and also with KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY.
> +		 */
>  		kvm->arch.pre_fault_allowed = true;
> +	}
>  
>  	kfree(id_auth);
>  
> @@ -3253,6 +3258,9 @@ void sev_free_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>  
> +	if (!svm->sev_es.vmsa)
> +		goto skip_vmsa_free;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * If it's an SNP guest, then the VMSA was marked in the RMP table as
>  	 * a guest-owned page. Transition the page to hypervisor state before
> @@ -4653,6 +4661,7 @@ void sev_init_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm, bool init_event)
>  
>  int sev_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	struct kvm_sev_info *sev = to_kvm_sev_info(vcpu->kvm);
>  	struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>  	struct page *vmsa_page;
>  
> @@ -4661,15 +4670,17 @@ int sev_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	if (!sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm))
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * SEV-ES guests require a separate (from the VMCB) VMSA page used to
> -	 * contain the encrypted register state of the guest.
> -	 */
> -	vmsa_page = snp_safe_alloc_page();
> -	if (!vmsa_page)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +	if (!sev->snp_finished) {
> +		/*
> +		 * SEV-ES guests require a separate (from the VMCB) VMSA page used to
> +		 * contain the encrypted register state of the guest.
> +		 */
> +		vmsa_page = snp_safe_alloc_page();
> +		if (!vmsa_page)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	svm->sev_es.vmsa = page_address(vmsa_page);
> +		svm->sev_es.vmsa = page_address(vmsa_page);
> +	}

I think there may be a race between this creation of a vCPU and the kvm_for_each_vcpu() loop in snp_launch_update_vmsa(). What should happen is that every vCPU that wasn't considered in snp_launch_update_vmsa() must not have a VMSA allocated here. If there is a race, I'm not sure what the best way is to prevent it.

>  
>  	vcpu->arch.guest_tsc_protected = snp_is_secure_tsc_enabled(vcpu->kvm);
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> index 01be93a53d07..59c328c13b2a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ struct kvm_sev_info {
>  	bool active;		/* SEV enabled guest */
>  	bool es_active;		/* SEV-ES enabled guest */
>  	bool need_init;		/* waiting for SEV_INIT2 */
> +	bool snp_finished;	/* SNP guest measurement has been finalized */
>  	unsigned int asid;	/* ASID used for this guest */
>  	unsigned int handle;	/* SEV firmware handle */
>  	int fd;			/* SEV device fd */


[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4839 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-19 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-19 19:06 Jethro Beekman
2026-01-19 19:12 ` Jethro Beekman [this message]
2026-02-25 20:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-02-25 20:13   ` Jethro Beekman
2026-02-25 20:21     ` Sean Christopherson
2026-02-25 20:30       ` Jethro Beekman
2026-02-26 19:30         ` Sean Christopherson
2026-03-07  1:51           ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b31f7c6e-2807-4662-bcdd-eea2c1e132fa@fortanix.com \
    --to=jethro@fortanix.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®