Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: change mutexes to guard macros

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>]

On 20/09/2026 15:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/09/2026 12:37, Omer PALA wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> I thought someone (not you) can allow this.
> 
> So you received feedback from Greg, but tried on different part, hoping
> this time it will get accepted?
> 
> This looks similar to you previous approaches, e.g. for DT bindings,
> where you received comments and repeated the same thing immediately.
> Three or four time.
> 
>>
>> I want to contribute kernel but i dont know what should i do.
> 
> I suggest spend some time to actually read the archives when people
> point it.
> 
> 
>>
>> I wrote 3 devicetree schemas, 2 performance fixes, 2 mutex/spinlock
>> fixes and 1 syntax fix.
>>
>> All of my work got NAK.
> 
> One was pure AI slop, so what did you expect exactly? In all channels,
> fediverse, some technological news, open source projects complain about
> sent slop, they reject it and treat it as one of biggest time wasting
> thing contributor could do. It is not like we hide it, right? Actually
> opposite, everywhere we scream - don't send vibe coded stuff. And for
> learning or beginning this is even unacceptable waste of your time,
> because you will learn nothing. I was raising it for GSoC for example
> more than once and it is documented in their rules.
> 
>>
>> Can you explain me what should i do?
> 
> One idea would be to read more before you actually contribute.

... and if you even asked your AI like I did now:
"how linux kernel developers look at LLM contributions from beginners?"
I got:

"Linux kernel developers view unverified AI-generated code from
beginners with heavy skepticism and frustration due to a massive influx
of low-quality submissions that overwhelm maintainers."


"Rejection of AI "slop": "

"Staging area bans: Certain high-traffic areas prone to beginner
contributions, such as the kernel's staging drivers (drivers/staging/),
have implemented strict policies forbidding LLM-generated patches ...."

Yet you did exactly what should not be done - were using LLM.

Best regards,
Krzysztof