From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, coresight@lists.linaro.org,
leo.yan@linaro.com, mike.leach@linaro.org
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>, John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] coresight: Add config flag to enable branch broadcast
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 11:19:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3545a88-4743-db95-4676-b0b193cbea78@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220113091056.1297982-2-james.clark@arm.com>
On 13/01/2022 09:10, James Clark wrote:
> When enabled, all taken branch addresses are output, even if the branch
> was because of a direct branch instruction. This enables reconstruction
> of the program flow without having access to the memory image of the
> code being executed.
>
> Use bit 8 for the config option which would be the correct bit for
> programming ETMv3. Although branch broadcast can't be enabled on ETMv3
> because it's not in the define ETM3X_SUPPORTED_OPTIONS, using the
> correct bit might help prevent future collisions or allow it to be
> enabled if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c | 2 ++
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 10 ++++++++++
> include/linux/coresight-pmu.h | 2 ++
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> index c039b6ae206f..43bbd5dc3d3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct coresight_device *, csdev_src);
> * The PMU formats were orignally for ETMv3.5/PTM's ETMCR 'config';
> * now take them as general formats and apply on all ETMs.
> */
> +PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(branch_broadcast, "config:"__stringify(ETM_OPT_BRANCH_BROADCAST));
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(cycacc, "config:" __stringify(ETM_OPT_CYCACC));
> /* contextid1 enables tracing CONTEXTIDR_EL1 for ETMv4 */
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(contextid1, "config:" __stringify(ETM_OPT_CTXTID));
> @@ -97,6 +98,7 @@ static struct attribute *etm_config_formats_attr[] = {
> &format_attr_sinkid.attr,
> &format_attr_preset.attr,
> &format_attr_configid.attr,
> + &format_attr_branch_broadcast.attr,
Does it make sense to hide the option if the bb is not supported ? I
guess it will be tricky as we don't track the common feature set. So,
that said...
> NULL,
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> index bf18128cf5de..04669ecc0efa 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c
> @@ -692,6 +692,16 @@ static int etm4_parse_event_config(struct coresight_device *csdev,
> ret = cscfg_csdev_enable_active_config(csdev, cfg_hash, preset);
> }
>
> + /* branch broadcast - enable if selected and supported */
> + if (attr->config & BIT(ETM_OPT_BRANCH_BROADCAST)) {
> + if (!drvdata->trcbb) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
Should we fail here ? We could simply ignore this and generate the trace
normally. This would work on a big.LITTLE system with one set missing
the branch broadcast, while the others support.
Mike,
Does this affect the trace decoding ? As such the OpenCSD should be able
to decode the packets as they appear in the stream. Correct ?
Suzuki
> + goto out;
> + } else {
> + config->cfg |= BIT(ETM4_CFG_BIT_BB);
> + }
> + }
> +
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/coresight-pmu.h b/include/linux/coresight-pmu.h
> index 4ac5c081af93..6c2fd6cc5a98 100644
> --- a/include/linux/coresight-pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/coresight-pmu.h
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> * ETMv3.5/PTM doesn't define ETMCR config bits with prefix "ETM3_" and
> * directly use below macros as config bits.
> */
> +#define ETM_OPT_BRANCH_BROADCAST 8
> #define ETM_OPT_CYCACC 12
> #define ETM_OPT_CTXTID 14
> #define ETM_OPT_CTXTID2 15
> @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@
> #define ETM_OPT_RETSTK 29
>
> /* ETMv4 CONFIGR programming bits for the ETM OPTs */
> +#define ETM4_CFG_BIT_BB 3
> #define ETM4_CFG_BIT_CYCACC 4
> #define ETM4_CFG_BIT_CTXTID 6
> #define ETM4_CFG_BIT_VMID 7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-13 9:10 [PATCH v2 0/6] " James Clark
2022-01-13 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] " James Clark
2022-01-21 12:43 ` Mike Leach
2022-01-28 11:19 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2022-02-02 20:25 ` Mike Leach
2022-03-11 14:58 ` James Clark
2022-03-11 15:56 ` Mike Leach
2022-04-22 10:18 ` James Clark
2022-05-04 9:46 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-01-13 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] coresight: Fail to open with return stacks if they are unavailable James Clark
2022-01-21 12:42 ` Mike Leach
2022-01-28 11:24 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-03-11 14:52 ` James Clark
2022-03-11 15:53 ` Mike Leach
2022-04-22 10:09 ` James Clark
2022-01-13 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] perf cs-etm: Update deduction of TRCCONFIGR register for branch broadcast James Clark
2022-01-21 12:44 ` Mike Leach
2022-01-28 11:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-02-15 14:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-13 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Documentation: coresight: Turn numbered subsections into real subsections James Clark
2022-01-21 12:47 ` Mike Leach
2022-01-28 11:26 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2022-01-13 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Documentation: coresight: Link config options to existing documentation James Clark
2022-01-21 12:49 ` Mike Leach
2022-01-13 9:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Documentation: coresight: Expand branch broadcast documentation James Clark
2022-01-21 12:50 ` Mike Leach
2022-01-27 20:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] coresight: Add config flag to enable branch broadcast Mathieu Poirier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b3545a88-4743-db95-4676-b0b193cbea78@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®