From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56F1409604; Tue, 1 Sep 2026 14:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788273964; cv=none; b=uI7/zni+eYSLXpYxiZjlDzPlucCnqrZv1Yu0jSE2c7Ep5tDcVN8p5TyKSYAtmrG8lXx9LO1/iUXT7G5s1ieCAozkvb+aXX4wXtqAWTMOgamjX7ozgmQ1VX2nNJ+/R9jwsjx8Viu8eqsOLXdz2EIf1gfAH99bd8L2F97xGBawFYg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1788273964; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rg41YJ2nUOvWEs6t32nKYpxXPPh9axGRgKO3wyA/ZR4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=lAXcKeoxcrsQze6OqNJIdO8TJQVGxkd8KhN9a9ZbjkwlL461PprVGsbdDZfoUQKH9oMk4heZg/EotPxhhhu3kufZHCi5Jt0lBRG/VhNdCki4DPwFETMi7+5stQnxo3o3inc0x4HebvEm/itYDVbySIBoogLzexiBa7UcbX1hPXI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CWdx8qAt; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CWdx8qAt" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 958E11F000E9; Tue, 1 Sep 2026 14:45:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1788273960; bh=Rg41YJ2nUOvWEs6t32nKYpxXPPh9axGRgKO3wyA/ZR4=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=CWdx8qAtwzJhZbKule/ym3WqnzXSgCSwIIP0F2bWcHJctnhgFsci/iB0FaP0wch8x RGGz2osnsh3b0KhhtVMOz4U9OdXaKuZTynnF+Fn9VpklEW+FWuQs4wU4OfIBa/DWMQ 5fQJG9GP0sejfdGdjk9thlqylxFXca6B+L13D9JfNmywzUCz2LLz6ow45rGRXo19Ia 0YtLE+ZgKeRc6MXmcqdauxdfkNfUOGvIvITNg83H9GoblEiCI0EXZp+pjIjfxJ4m93 0NxsDtzUvMQfsRC+O3g+lBxNDhRq+tlEO85sNfqcDbcpY85fDU5Yr0jqRqJ7W+kwFF ZJQuzrTZyGH2g== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 16:45:56 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] gpu: nova-core: fix barrier usage in CPU->GSP messaging path To: Gary Guo Cc: Eliot Courtney , Alice Ryhl , Alexandre Courbot , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel References: <20260819-rust-barrier-v3-0-d5b7bd7e6624@garyguo.net> <20260819-rust-barrier-v3-1-d5b7bd7e6624@garyguo.net> From: Danilo Krummrich Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/1/26 1:43 PM, Gary Guo wrote: > So unless there's an objection, I'll take the second approach by moving barrrier > to pointer accessors/updaters and mark these methods to have acq/rel semantics. Much in favor of that. Thanks, Danilo