From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18C4937F0EC; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 08:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768379262; cv=none; b=OT7ur+PUtmA5eioq1WHbitfswfrXMp+nFjwsZMZjTvNBDshwQETuKcMo9m8xBzgZSzWWbPMT6l/7iTxZyJlZYLDPO7sTnoOA3FDJTDNVh6Jw/xWxyvo6Z4ALclrmv3ZGuCoJd2tUzqH+n1ysoMoPvj5Um0JyxcW35mOJm0bcJF8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768379262; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8MK2K1fASDPVnowqxQJ1JsgFLtEXmJrr6pW4o1QRCyc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=qeG9sSCk2HdmhZajOWlQJNVGeXYLNgop6UzN2KYFDxvbaC9kFJOaUlGZLLgYnLiUcybwKwzFqwV3V/Tngk7YmuHuaYJDnxRFBc/STMEisMiaAMtDQ0B+lHprQW0X8lmtwms0r5bK9x+G8yYoJPdHmNEkZ1y5J8pMIuT4DtTP2tE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=UdOb5SP5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="UdOb5SP5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1768379254; bh=8MK2K1fASDPVnowqxQJ1JsgFLtEXmJrr6pW4o1QRCyc=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=UdOb5SP5TUuhuFc/WhQJMKtJekNVy54o3R38/WoQOOwEqbI7Va76TVfEYmO9/o7G0 osO2Dkd+3GI4pdGm9DxibTNa3cFFqVe8WfdT+MsFCvNhTXYBstc3/Cqb95tBD0rmIZ CJ6f+G2Di4ibr0mPV+RLLFpmBuhlT0vNaDbYp21iDG1XCJzos/SAbwVajHb7AAOaKD WBia4g9eXgNJ4B5l0m6bUV+DiclrhgU/GxxWQTWZRQcoLuhex+WX+X3acRLMP8N2cM 1TqAIYUYg0uEW9ekIygOQAyOdpljqwakRH+bvff9FedRviDiosITXaBb58PXcW+RS0 ZJVO7cSIognsw== Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73DE517E0139; Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:27:34 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2026 09:27:33 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: Allow single vdo/mmsys endpoint To: Rob Herring Cc: krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com References: <20260108143934.69634-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com> <20260113225346.GA367211-robh@kernel.org> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20260113225346.GA367211-robh@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Il 13/01/26 23:53, Rob Herring ha scritto: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2026 at 03:39:32PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> The hardware supports using just a single output while leaving all >> of the others unconfigured (disabled), but the binding did not >> really allow specifying a single endpoint@0, because in this case >> one must either: >> - Call the subnode `endpoint` and not declare any address and/or >> size cells; or >> - Call the subnode `endpoint@0` and have at least one more other >> endpoint(@1 or @2), and declare address/size cells. >> >> Allow specifying a single `endpoint` subnode, without the `@0` >> implicit suffix to suppress warnings happening on this kind of >> valid usecase. > > This series isn't needed. We've dropped this check from dtc. I'll do a > sync with upstream. > > In any case, it's also a W=1 warning which wouldn't be my top priority. > > Rob Oh, okay! Thanks for the feedback :D Cheers, Angelo