From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751916AbeEKVNo (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2018 17:13:44 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:38776 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751321AbeEKVNl (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 May 2018 17:13:41 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZrOSE8azWh0pG2/xS/COZBTucu78tZ1pElEsTq+e71MVqtCQeinrmLJKq4JicsJRTHpoE+erQ== Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Misc block layer patches for bcachefs To: Kent Overstreet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Ingo Molnar References: <20180509013358.16399-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> From: Jens Axboe Message-ID: Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 15:13:38 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180509013358.16399-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 5/8/18 7:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote: > - Add separately allowed mempools, biosets: bcachefs uses both all over the > place > > - Bit of utility code - bio_copy_data_iter(), zero_fill_bio_iter() > > - bio_list_copy_data(), the bi_next check - defensiveness because of a bug I > had fun chasing down at one point > > - add some exports, because bcachefs does dio its own way > - show whether fua is supported in sysfs, because I don't know of anything that > exports whether the _block layer_ specifically thinks fua is supported. Looked over the series, and looks like both good cleanups and optimizations. If we can get the mempool patch sorted, I can apply this for 4.18. -- Jens Axboe