From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064D52E5B11; Tue, 8 Jul 2025 16:40:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751992806; cv=none; b=NR/ikgi2EIZDSyogmJwJzNs/e+6WjZOnDnfbBUrMt9pE0KhdWnke/jD1J8GTjHNwEmysZwUDGk3HMM77g/rLag/oZ0s/CDHclDKu5jEn0ZIB90JKur1KsD5a4Zx5UDp251t8eOXah/nf6wZCS53qZR0gJbfGP6RIYQmy5BXQqcM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751992806; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ONbcMMuBpDKvVYqTKA6WEv/23LdYMCSzD36Cn6S4Wes=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=sqz8DrcNXtW6QB1vwjCX1Wo9JqJP35048ELDWh4Be/JdLHOnXW207v97T8N9a1VvjRDU1e9xeIwbk+r9g9+ekrewv6dXxbCqUL3SdHrp5qQffF2/BhiPxHwjB8CdR2Tl7y+CfxOL6wyvN1W2xu6rSsdBUmk2SNTQ2OHTNQYasj8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=W5tDj252; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="W5tDj252" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=dWz3CQl3Hyfv4Ozhor8+07wg6X7dBTPFYEAyJfxYObQ=; b=W5tDj252G837QmC8BdmftZjzei j2OFy2XAgMpSVYiMTPnWSatB5hUYTehmfiGGEpsCcr0WOrKzkSfIw9/+JS4X7ltAaDxvMSnos0+vl Mhm1vNbSwFDbffuN/sYNjoUnDFSxjeP0tQuFf+/lh3CaVHB+B0IxkP1g8eGkOdhQaOe4=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uZBMA-000qSM-HV; Tue, 08 Jul 2025 18:39:46 +0200 Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 18:39:46 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Lukas Schmid Cc: Andre Przywara , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Chen-Yu Tsai , Jernej Skrabec , Samuel Holland , Paul Walmsley , Palmer Dabbelt , Albert Ou , Alexandre Ghiti , Maxime Ripard , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] ARM: dts: sunxi: add support for NetCube Systems Nagami SoM Message-ID: References: <20250707184420.275991-1-lukas.schmid@netcube.li> <20250707184420.275991-4-lukas.schmid@netcube.li> <20250708002205.70ec9097@minigeek.lan> <3700020.R56niFO833@lukas-hpz440workstation> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3700020.R56niFO833@lukas-hpz440workstation> On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 05:19:31PM +0200, Lukas Schmid wrote: > On Dienstag, 8. Juli 2025 01:22:05 CEST Andre Przywara wrote: > > On Mon, 7 Jul 2025 20:44:15 +0200 > > Lukas Schmid wrote: > > > Hi Andre, > > > Hi Lukas, > > > > please try to refrain from sending subsequent patches too quickly, that > > might just put off and confuse reviewers. To acknowledge a change > > request, it is probably sufficient to just reply to the mail with a > > confirmation. > > Sorry about that. I'm still trying to get the hang of this whole "submitting > patches" thing. What is a good time/reason to send the next revision/version > of a patchset? It varies per subsystem. For netdev there is a clear rule to wait 24 hours. For other subsystems, it might not be documented. GregKH used to say he would always respond within 2 weeks for USB patches. To some extent, you just need to see how fast each Maintainer works, and resubmit based on that. Also, if there is a discussion going on, you need to wait for that discussion to come to some sort of conclusion before reposting a new version. Andrew