mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sarthak Sharma <sarthak.sharma@arm.com>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
	"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Nico Pache <nico.pache@linux.dev>,
	Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>, Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>,
	Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>, Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>,
	Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
	Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] kselftest: mm: remove HPAGE_SIZE and HPAGE_SHIFT macro
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 18:52:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3f2a0bf-7b41-4cc9-958e-34f1a88ff5bf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013-fix_hpage_macro-v7-2-3d77129e0557@arm.com>

Hi Yeoreum!

On 10/13/26 4:07 PM, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> HPAGE_SIZE and HPAGE_SHIFT macro is written based on the 4KB PAGE_SIZE.
> When this macro is used in some test, test result would be strange in
> the system where PAGE_SIZE is more then 4KB.
> 
> Here is the example with transhuge-stress test with 16KB PAGE_SIZE:
> 
>   transhuge-stress: allocate 61073 transhuge pages, using 122146 MiB virtual memory and 1908 MiB of ram
>     3.292 s/loop, 0.054 ms/page,  37106.002 MiB/s	2566 succeed, 58507 failed, 2566 different pages
>     0.591 s/loop, 0.010 ms/page, 206850.792 MiB/s	   0 succeed, 61073 failed,    0 different pages
>     0.527 s/loop, 0.009 ms/page, 231895.107 MiB/s	   0 succeed, 61073 failed,    0 different pages
>     0.527 s/loop, 0.009 ms/page, 231839.704 MiB/s	   0 succeed, 61073 failed,    0 different pages
>     0.528 s/loop, 0.009 ms/page, 231544.782 MiB/s	   0 succeed, 61073 failed,    0 different pages
>     0.528 s/loop, 0.009 ms/page, 231462.074 MiB/s	   0 succeed, 61073 failed,    0 different pages
>     0.527 s/loop, 0.009 ms/page, 231770.300 MiB/s	   0 succeed, 61073 failed,    0 different pages
>     ...
>   ok 1 Completed
> 
> Remove the HPAGE_SIZE and HPAGE_SHIFT macro and introduce pmd_pshift()
> helper to get the HPAGE_SHIFT properly. For HPAGE_SIZE, use pre-existing
> helper, pmd_psize().
> 
> Also, run the KSM_MERGE_TIME_HUGE_PAGES test with a size of 512 MiB,
> which is the least common multiple of the PMD sizes for 4 KiB, 16 KiB,
> and 64 KiB base pages. Since allocate_transhuge() allocates mappings in
> PMD-sized units, the test may fail with the previous size of 100 MiB,
> which is not a multiple of the PMD size when the base page size is
> 16 KiB or 64 KiB.
> 
> After this patch, output of transhuge-stress:
> 
>   transhuge-stress: allocate 3817 transhuge pages, using 122146 MiB virtual memory and 119 MiB of ram
>     2.558 s/loop, 0.670 ms/page,  47755.759 MiB/s	2585 succeed, 1232 failed, 2585 different pages
>     2.640 s/loop, 0.692 ms/page,  46268.432 MiB/s	2585 succeed, 1232 failed, 2585 different pages
>     2.635 s/loop, 0.690 ms/page,  46360.298 MiB/s	2585 succeed, 1232 failed, 2585 different pages
>     2.782 s/loop, 0.729 ms/page,  43899.795 MiB/s	2616 succeed, 1201 failed, 2616 different pages
>     2.692 s/loop, 0.705 ms/page,  45380.876 MiB/s	2627 succeed, 1190 failed, 2627 different pages
>     2.612 s/loop, 0.684 ms/page,  46765.812 MiB/s	2628 succeed, 1189 failed, 2628 different pages
>     2.683 s/loop, 0.703 ms/page,  45520.990 MiB/s	2630 succeed, 1187 failed, 2630 different pages
>     2.727 s/loop, 0.714 ms/page,  44789.321 MiB/s	2631 succeed, 1186 failed, 2631 different pages
>     ...
>   ok 1 Completed
> 
> Suggested-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c    | 10 +++++--
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_tests.c        | 16 ++++++-----
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh     |  4 +--
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c | 25 +++++++++++-------
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.c          | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  tools/testing/selftests/mm/vm_util.h          |  9 +++----
>  6 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c
> index f7d53ea3c2527..02f69244f9a42 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/guard-regions.c
> @@ -2194,14 +2194,20 @@ TEST_F(guard_regions, pagemap_scan)
>  TEST_F(guard_regions, collapse)
>  {
>  	const unsigned long page_size = self->page_size;
> -	const unsigned long size = 2 * HPAGE_SIZE;
> -	const unsigned long num_pages = size / page_size;
> +	const uint64_t hpage_size = pmd_psize();
> +	unsigned long size, num_pages;
>  	char *ptr;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	if (!thp_available())
>  		SKIP(return, "Transparent Hugepages not available\n");
>  
> +	if (!hpage_size)
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("reading hpage_size failed\n");

I'm sorry for not catching this earlier, but I don't think calling a
ksft_exit_fail_msg() for not being able to calculate PMD size is a good
idea. Maybe call an ASSERT*() here, something like

ASSERT_NE(hpage_size, 0);

so that just this test fails, instead of the whole run exiting with a
bail out?

> +
> +	size = 2 * hpage_size;
> +	num_pages = size / page_size;
> +
>  	/* Need file to be correct size for tests for non-anon. */
>  	if (variant->backing != ANON_BACKED)
>  		ASSERT_EQ(ftruncate(self->fd, size), 0);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_tests.c
> index 6711f4c613711..9e6e1633d0b53 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/ksm_tests.c
> @@ -520,19 +520,23 @@ static int ksm_merge_hugepages_time(int merge_type, int mapping, int prot,
>  	struct timespec start_time, end_time;
>  	unsigned long scan_time_ns;
>  	int pagemap_fd, n_normal_pages, n_huge_pages;
> +	const uint64_t hpage_size = pmd_psize();
>  
>  	if (!thp_is_enabled()) {
>  		ksft_print_msg("Transparent Hugepages not available\n");
>  		return KSFT_SKIP;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!hpage_size)
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("reading hpage_size failed\n");

Similarly here, maybe this would be better?

if (!hpage_size) {
	ksft_print_msg("Reading hpage_size failed\n");
	return KSFT_FAIL;
}

> +
>  	map_size *= MB;
>  	size_t len = map_size;
>  
> -	len -= len % HPAGE_SIZE;
> -	map_ptr_orig = mmap(NULL, len + HPAGE_SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> +	len -= len % hpage_size;
> +	map_ptr_orig = mmap(NULL, len + hpage_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
>  			MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_NORESERVE | MAP_PRIVATE, -1, 0);
> -	map_ptr = map_ptr_orig + HPAGE_SIZE - (uintptr_t)map_ptr_orig % HPAGE_SIZE;
> +	map_ptr = map_ptr_orig + hpage_size - (uintptr_t)map_ptr_orig % hpage_size;
>  
>  	if (map_ptr_orig == MAP_FAILED)
>  		err(2, "initial mmap");
> @@ -546,7 +550,7 @@ static int ksm_merge_hugepages_time(int merge_type, int mapping, int prot,
>  
>  	n_normal_pages = 0;
>  	n_huge_pages = 0;
> -	for (void *p = map_ptr; p < map_ptr + len; p += HPAGE_SIZE) {
> +	for (void *p = map_ptr; p < map_ptr + len; p += hpage_size) {
>  		if (allocate_transhuge(p, pagemap_fd) < 0)
>  			n_normal_pages++;
>  		else
> @@ -577,11 +581,11 @@ static int ksm_merge_hugepages_time(int merge_type, int mapping, int prot,
>  	ksft_print_msg("Average speed:  %.3f MiB/s\n", (map_size / MB) /
>  					       ((double)scan_time_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC));
>  
> -	munmap(map_ptr_orig, len + HPAGE_SIZE);
> +	munmap(map_ptr_orig, len + hpage_size);
>  	return KSFT_PASS;
>  
>  err_out:
> -	munmap(map_ptr_orig, len + HPAGE_SIZE);
> +	munmap(map_ptr_orig, len + hpage_size);
>  	return KSFT_FAIL;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
> index a1b45a3dedaee..f3ec767f562b8 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/run_vmtests.sh
> @@ -343,8 +343,8 @@ fi
>  CATEGORY="memfd_secret" run_test ./memfd_secret
>  fi
>  
> -# KSM KSM_MERGE_TIME_HUGE_PAGES test with size of 100
> -CATEGORY="ksm" run_test ./ksm_tests -H -s 100
> +# KSM KSM_MERGE_TIME_HUGE_PAGES test with size of 512
> +CATEGORY="ksm" run_test ./ksm_tests -H -s 512
>  # KSM KSM_MERGE_TIME test with size of 100
>  CATEGORY="ksm" run_test ./ksm_tests -P -s 100
>  # KSM MADV_MERGEABLE test with 10 identical pages
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c
> index 96f72898ebe0a..ad2831c864dc3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/transhuge-stress.c
> @@ -34,12 +34,17 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  	size_t map_len;
>  	int pagemap_fd;
>  	int duration = 0;
> +	const uint64_t hpage_size = pmd_psize();
> +	const uint64_t hpage_shift = pmd_pshift();
>  
>  	ksft_print_header();
>  
>  	if (!thp_is_enabled())
>  		ksft_exit_skip("Transparent Hugepages not available\n");
>  
> +	if (!hpage_size || !hpage_shift)
> +		ksft_exit_fail_msg("reading hpage_size failed\n");

Makes sense to call an ksft_exit_fail_msg() here since it requires PMD
size to run its one and only test.


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13 10:37 [PATCH v7 0/3] " Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-13 10:37 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] kselftest: mm: rename read_pmd_pagesize() to pmd_psize() Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-13 10:37 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] kselftest: mm: remove HPAGE_SIZE and HPAGE_SHIFT macro Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-13 13:22   ` Sarthak Sharma [this message]
2026-10-13 14:11     ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-13 18:42       ` Sarthak Sharma
2026-10-13 19:17         ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-10-13 10:37 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] kselftest: mm: introduce size_to_shift() helper Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b3f2a0bf-7b41-4cc9-958e-34f1a88ff5bf@arm.com \
    --to=sarthak.sharma@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baohua@kernel.org \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=kas@kernel.org \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=liam@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=nico.pache@linux.dev \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
    --cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®