mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>,
	linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] nvme-pci: defer completions when rescheduling is needed
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 21:54:42 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b3f3b6fe-893c-4a24-b8c0-3a929cb581ac@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aszuckZVkc2-kXM3@kbusch-mbp>



On 10/12/2026 7:58 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2026 at 12:17:38PM +0530, Naman Jain wrote:
>>> The disable_irq_nosync still does non-posted transactions for msi and
>>> msi-x. NVMe has a shortcut for msi, but there's currently nothing for
>>> msi-x. For that case, I have a prep patch I consulted with Thomas, and
>>> the result is below. I'm delayed sending it out while catching up from
>>> travel, but I think this will be even more efficient.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for sharing. I'll give it a try. IIUC, after your patch goes in, I
>> should be using disable_irq_nowait() in above and see better performance.
> 
> Yes, exactly. It should save hundreds of CPU cycles on every switch from
> irq to polling.
> 

Understood.

>> Please correct me if I am wrong. I'll monitor your patch in LKML for future
>> versions.
> 
> I need a user for the new API. NVMe is the only one I have in mind
> right now, so this new irq disable would have to be tied to the series
> that does the adaptive polling.

Acked. For this series, there are couple of solutions floating around in 
LKML, and we are trying to converge on the final approach. Once 
finalized, if we still need to call disable_irq_sync(), we can make use 
of this new API. In any case, if I happen to send the next version of 
this, I can use the new APIs, creating dependency on your changes.

Regards,
Naman

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-12 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-09  5:05 [RFC PATCH 0/3] nvme-pci: yield completions under scheduler pressure Naman Jain
2026-10-09  5:05 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] nvme-pci: select IRQ_POLL Naman Jain
2026-10-09  5:05 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] nvme-pci: make completion queue polling softirq-safe Naman Jain
2026-10-09  5:05 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] nvme-pci: defer completions when rescheduling is needed Naman Jain
2026-10-09 15:30   ` Keith Busch
2026-10-12  6:47     ` Naman Jain
2026-10-12 14:28       ` Keith Busch
2026-10-12 16:24         ` Naman Jain [this message]
2026-10-09  5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] nvme-pci: yield completions under scheduler pressure Michael Kelley
2026-10-09  6:51   ` Naman Jain
2026-10-09 10:16     ` Naman Jain
2026-10-09 11:27       ` Luigi Rizzo
2026-10-09 14:58         ` Luigi Rizzo
2026-10-12  8:19           ` Naman Jain
2026-10-12  9:17             ` Luigi Rizzo
2026-10-09 11:36       ` Fengnan
2026-10-12  6:48         ` Naman Jain
2026-10-12  7:00           ` Fengnan
2026-10-12  8:51             ` Naman Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b3f3b6fe-893c-4a24-b8c0-3a929cb581ac@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®