mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <llong@redhat.com>
To: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>,
	cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, nilal@redhat.com, frederic@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: Avoid memory migration when nodemasks match
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:18:57 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b404f50a-6a35-92d5-1500-613296d0807f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210825105415.1365360-1-nsaenzju@redhat.com>

On 8/25/21 6:54 AM, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> With the introduction of ee9707e8593d ("cgroup/cpuset: Enable memory
> migration for cpuset v2") attaching a process to a different cgroup will
> trigger a memory migration regardless of whether it's really needed.
> Memory migration is an expensive operation, so bypass it if the
> nodemasks passed to cpuset_migrate_mm() are equal.
>
> Note that we're not only avoiding the migration work itself, but also a
> call to lru_cache_disable(), which triggers and flushes an LRU drain
> work on every online CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@redhat.com>
>
> ---
>
> NOTE: This also alleviates hangs I stumbled upon while testing
> linux-next on systems with nohz_full CPUs (running latency sensitive
> loads). ee9707e8593d's newly imposed memory migration never finishes, as
> the LRU drain is never scheduled on isolated CPUs.
>
> I tried to follow the user-space call trace, it's something like this:
>
>    Create new tmux pane, which triggers hostname operation, hangs...
>      -> systemd (pid 1) creates new hostnamed process (using clone())
>        -> hostnamed process attaches itself to:
>    	 "system.slice/systemd-hostnamed.service/cgroup.procs"
>          -> hangs... Waiting for LRU drain to finish on nohz_full CPUs.
>
> As far as CPU isolation is concerned, this calls for better
> understanding of the underlying issues. For example, should LRU be made
> CPU isolation aware or should we deal with it at cgroup/cpuset level? In
> the meantime, I figured this small optimization is worthwhile on its
> own.
>
>   kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 5 +++++
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> index 44d234b0df5e..d497a65c4f04 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c
> @@ -1634,6 +1634,11 @@ static void cpuset_migrate_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, const nodemask_t *from,
>   {
>   	struct cpuset_migrate_mm_work *mwork;
>   
> +	if (nodes_equal(*from, *to)) {
> +		mmput(mm);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	mwork = kzalloc(sizeof(*mwork), GFP_KERNEL);
>   	if (mwork) {
>   		mwork->mm = mm;

Thanks for the fix. So cpuset v1 with memory_migrate flag set will have 
the same problem then.

Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>

Cheers,
Longman


      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-25 10:54 Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2021-08-25 16:53 ` Tejun Heo
2021-08-25 19:18 ` Waiman Long [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b404f50a-6a35-92d5-1500-613296d0807f@redhat.com \
    --to=llong@redhat.com \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=nilal@redhat.com \
    --cc=nsaenzju@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®