From: Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Jiazi Li <jiazi.li@transsion.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix cpu_util runnable_avg arithmetic
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2026 10:21:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b431cffe-8295-4a66-80f0-1b8539a33b3f@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtAW8s21iTD6Wf3brgT6nfB5xa=z6gPrh2vGqoVPb+3jww@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/5/26 09:51, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jun 2026 at 09:01, Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
>>
>> If we take runnable_avg in max(runnable_avg, util_avg) in cpu_util(), we
>> should then add or subtract task runnable_avg, but the arithmetic below
>> is still with task util_avg. This mixes runnable_avg with util_avg which
>> is incorrect.
>>
>> Fix by always doing arithmetic with runnable_avg and only take
>> max(runnable_avg, util_avg) at the last step.
>>
>> Fixes: 7d0583cf9ec7 ("sched/fair, cpufreq: Introduce 'runnable boosting'")
>> Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xia <hongyan.xia@transsion.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index 69361c63353a..050bce06efea 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -8231,25 +8231,31 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
>> static unsigned long
>> cpu_util(int cpu, struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu, int boost)
>> {
>> + bool add_task = p && task_cpu(p) != cpu && dst_cpu == cpu;
>> + bool sub_task = p && task_cpu(p) == cpu && dst_cpu != cpu;
>> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = &cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs;
>> unsigned long util = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.util_avg);
>> unsigned long runnable;
>>
>> - if (boost) {
>> - runnable = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.runnable_avg);
>> - util = max(util, runnable);
>> - }
>> -
>> /*
>> * If @dst_cpu is -1 or @p migrates from @cpu to @dst_cpu remove its
>> * contribution. If @p migrates from another CPU to @cpu add its
>> * contribution. In all the other cases @cpu is not impacted by the
>> * migration so its util_avg is already correct.
>> */
>> - if (p && task_cpu(p) == cpu && dst_cpu != cpu)
>> - lsub_positive(&util, task_util(p));
>> - else if (p && task_cpu(p) != cpu && dst_cpu == cpu)
>> + if (add_task)
>> util += task_util(p);
>> + else if (sub_task)
>> + lsub_positive(&util, task_util(p));
>> +
>> + if (boost) {
>> + runnable = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.runnable_avg);
>> + if (add_task)
>> + runnable += task_runnable(p);
>
> Where did you get the task_runnable() function? I can't find it in
> tip/sched/core so either create it or call
> READ_ONCE(p->se.avg.runnable_avg) directly
It's there for me on tip/sched/core at
7675361ff9a1 sched: deadline: Cleanup goto label in pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task
but also 7.1-rc6?
>
>
>> + else if (sub_task)
>> + lsub_positive(&runnable, task_runnable(p));
>> + util = max(util, runnable);
>> + }
>>
>> if (sched_feat(UTIL_EST)) {
>> unsigned long util_est;
>> --
>> 2.47.3
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-05 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-05 7:01 Hongyan Xia
2026-06-05 8:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2026-06-05 9:12 ` Hongyan Xia
2026-06-05 9:21 ` Christian Loehle [this message]
2026-06-05 9:23 ` Christian Loehle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b431cffe-8295-4a66-80f0-1b8539a33b3f@arm.com \
--to=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hongyan.xia@transsion.com \
--cc=jiazi.li@transsion.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®