From: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
To: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Bharata B Rao <bharata@amd.com>,
Hrushikesh Salunke <hsalunke@amd.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/memory: drop PROCESS_PAGES_NON_PREEMPT_BATCH
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2026 23:00:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b47cc8f4-3f8a-4893-8a2a-f88dd5ab762d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109-clear-pages-batch-v3-1-6693efe18dff@amd.com>
On 11/9/26 20:15, Shivank Garg wrote:
> clear_contig_highpages() clears the whole range at once under
> preemptible models. Otherwise it clears PROCESS_PAGES_NON_PREEMPT_BATCH
> pages at a time, with a cond_resched() in between. The batch is 32MB if
> the architecture defines clear_pages(), and one page otherwise.
>
> Since commit 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption
> modes"), architectures that support lazy preemption only offer the
> full, lazy and RT preemption models, also with PREEMPT_DYNAMIC. x86 is
> one of them, and it is the only architecture that defines
> clear_pages(). So the 32MB batch is never used: whenever
> clear_contig_highpages() runs under a cooperative model, the batch is
> one page.
>
> Make that explicit. Clear the whole range when CONFIG_PREEMPTION is
> set, and one page at a time with cond_resched() in between otherwise.
> Drop PROCESS_PAGES_NON_PREEMPT_BATCH, which has no other users.
>
> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC kernels also have CONFIG_PREEMPTION set, and
> cond_resched() does nothing on any of these kernels. So a build-time
> CONFIG_PREEMPTION check is enough, and preempt_model_preemptible() is
> not needed.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
> ---
>
Thanks, I'll wait a bit for more review before applying.
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
--
Cheers,
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 19:15 Shivank Garg
2026-11-09 22:00 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm) [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b47cc8f4-3f8a-4893-8a2a-f88dd5ab762d@kernel.org \
--to=david@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=bharata@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hsalunke@amd.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=shivankg@amd.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®