From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: <babu.moger@amd.com>, <corbet@lwn.net>, <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<mingo@redhat.com>, <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
<x86@kernel.org>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <paulmck@kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
<rdunlap@infradead.org>, <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
<songmuchun@bytedance.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
<jpoimboe@kernel.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
<chang.seok.bae@intel.com>, <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
<jmattson@google.com>, <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
<sandipan.das@amd.com>, <tony.luck@intel.com>,
<james.morse@arm.com>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
<eranian@google.com>, <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
<jarkko@kernel.org>, <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
<quic_jiles@quicinc.com>, <peternewman@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] x86/resctrl: Unwind the errors inside rdt_enable_ctx()
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 10:56:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b48d2489-a5af-d9af-08e6-cbc2d5d8194f@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54236122-55d8-fd4a-1791-e6f96a61e3f0@amd.com>
Hi Babu,
On 8/30/2023 9:38 AM, Moger, Babu wrote:
> On 8/29/23 15:10, Reinette Chatre wrote:
>> On 8/21/2023 4:30 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>>> static int rdt_enable_ctx(struct rdt_fs_context *ctx)
>>> {
>>> int ret = 0;
>>>
>>> - if (ctx->enable_cdpl2)
>>> + if (ctx->enable_cdpl2) {
>>> ret = resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(RDT_RESOURCE_L2, true);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto out_done;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> - if (!ret && ctx->enable_cdpl3)
>>> + if (ctx->enable_cdpl3) {
>>> ret = resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(RDT_RESOURCE_L3, true);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto out_cdpl2;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> - if (!ret && ctx->enable_mba_mbps)
>>> + if (ctx->enable_mba_mbps) {
>>> ret = set_mba_sc(true);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + goto out_cdpl3;
>>
>> An error may be encountered here without CDP ever enabled or just
>> enabled for L2 or L3. I think that the error unwinding should
>> take care to not unwind an action that was not done. Considering
>> the information available I think checking either ctx->enable_...
>> or the checks used in rdt_disable_ctx() would be ok but for consistency
>> the resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled() checks may be most appropriate.
>>
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>>
>>> +out_cdpl3:
>>
>> So here I think there should be a check.
>> if (resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(RDT_RESOURCE_L3))
>>
>>> + resctrl_arch_set_cdp_enabled(RDT_RESOURCE_L3, false);
>>> +out_cdpl2:
>>
>> ... and here a check:
>> if (resctrl_arch_get_cdp_enabled(RDT_RESOURCE_L2))
>
>
> I know it does not hurt to add these checks. But, it may be unnecessary
> considering cdp_disable() has the check "if (r_hw->cdp_enabled)" already.
> Both are same checks. What do you think?
Yes, good point. Thank you for checking. Considering this it looks like
rdt_disable_ctx() can be simplified also by removing those CDP
enabled checks from it? Also looks like rdt_disable_ctx()-> set_mba_sc(false)
can be called unconditionally.
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-30 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-21 23:30 [PATCH v8 0/8] x86/resctrl: Miscellaneous resctrl features Babu Moger
2023-08-21 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 1/8] x86/resctrl: Add multiple tasks to the resctrl group at once Babu Moger
2023-09-01 22:13 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-09-06 14:56 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-06 20:42 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-09-07 14:44 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-07 14:51 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-21 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 2/8] x86/resctrl: Simplify rftype flag definitions Babu Moger
2023-09-01 22:14 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-21 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 3/8] x86/resctrl: Rename rftype flags for consistency Babu Moger
2023-09-01 22:15 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-21 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 4/8] x86/resctrl: Add comments on RFTYPE flags hierarchy Babu Moger
2023-08-23 7:03 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-08-23 15:56 ` Moger, Babu
2023-08-29 20:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-30 16:30 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-01 22:31 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-09-06 15:10 ` Moger, Babu
2023-08-21 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 5/8] x86/resctrl: Unwind the errors inside rdt_enable_ctx() Babu Moger
2023-08-29 20:10 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-30 16:38 ` Moger, Babu
2023-08-30 17:56 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2023-08-30 18:28 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-01 23:33 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-21 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 6/8] x86/resctrl: Move default group file creation to mount Babu Moger
2023-08-29 20:11 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-30 19:50 ` Moger, Babu
2023-08-30 20:00 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-30 21:18 ` Moger, Babu
2023-08-30 22:05 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-30 23:24 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-01 23:21 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-09-01 23:36 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-01 23:46 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-09-01 23:48 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-06 15:19 ` Moger, Babu
2023-08-21 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 7/8] x86/resctrl: Introduce "-o debug" mount option Babu Moger
2023-08-29 20:12 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-30 21:45 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-01 22:35 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-21 23:30 ` [PATCH v8 8/8] x86/resctrl: Display hardware ids of resource groups Babu Moger
2023-08-29 20:14 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-30 23:19 ` Moger, Babu
2023-08-31 17:42 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-08-31 23:58 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-01 0:43 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-01 17:28 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-01 17:57 ` Reinette Chatre
2023-09-05 16:51 ` Moger, Babu
2023-09-01 22:44 ` Fenghua Yu
2023-08-23 7:06 ` [PATCH v8 0/8] x86/resctrl: Miscellaneous resctrl features Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2023-08-23 15:12 ` Moger, Babu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b48d2489-a5af-d9af-08e6-cbc2d5d8194f@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome