From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [220.197.31.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EF8F2110E for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 06:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.5 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790056980; cv=none; b=aSXsNTh6qMqlmgB1I6tQBbzWOSsxcfFulJ/sVcgyUhMDA13quWK/Y3ohIB3ML7PRwBSNxRUwRHhwqcuah+K6c5T4+EpUwHsJmvhOrBTrr6sKURvpMjJgsjA0hs8Cacz1mlrB05iOjSWs/dK7R5MYkOyxkV8z783PshalrNMZwf8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1790056980; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jx5594RU8DdFf/2v8JNAJPTO/7koTsW9e90r745CEi0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=lOkjnVASX6EHI3hRgkNzlGHBfXXrOQ6eDfNtTEs9a1KJx0yQMj36Nvt56eq2oYbW+9/+rhsiRLlGVjefsZ55/iO6TLDDymOsBA8CTDX1faeEa2GjOH6lAnXXoMcqLCswGiUPyqDlFkw8NquxZbCgL+UJRjVdglwbyY8H6bSNP+c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=nDA/g1JX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=220.197.31.5 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="nDA/g1JX" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From: Content-Type; bh=466KslwKlfjekfOm2hS1Z/axn9i8d3Pi0sKWLtyduoM=; b=nDA/g1JXQ6LLUsYfOwAZIGo3KTxo5bi7gHGgEX9imfMn5Y+sgtjJ2N2moCKAHE ixGCABEJRm4BazsHW/yx2eQuaKCUDMUXyFTStm0du5CdE6ThvPqWupBL/WzC+ssA gVt3waomJ+REKi1qFRdHU/uMTTG8BSWniSVQ7gpvVNv40= Received: from [IPV6:2409:8900:1ee3:222c:420f:a5a2:eb51:8645] (unknown []) by gzga-smtp-mtada-g0-3 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wD33+jrGbJqT3E6AA--.19026S2; Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:02:22 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:02:19 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] ntfs: persist immutable in the $LXFLAGS EA To: Hyunchul Lee Cc: linkinjeon@kernel.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chenxiaosong@chenxiaosong.com, Baolin Liu References: <20260920083131.1880061-1-liubaolin12138@163.com> <20260920083131.1880061-9-liubaolin12138@163.com> <250dd5e5-4a4e-4547-b205-f0b52bae4775@163.com> Content-Language: en-US From: liubaolin In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wD33+jrGbJqT3E6AA--.19026S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoW7CFy8GF13WF4UCF4xJryDAwb_yoW8XFy7pr 95Ca1jyw4ktr1UJFs2gF40yay0y3yxCa4jqFn8Gr1qkFn0g3W7trW0yr1Fkw1kKr1xtF4U XayIqF1xta17uaDanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07U2zuZUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: xolxutxrol0iasrtmqqrwthudrp/xtbC6Q7Ik2qyGe7DEgAA3C 在 2026/9/22 13:25, Hyunchul Lee 写道: > 2026년 9월 22일 (화) 오후 12:27, liubaolin 님이 작성: >> >> >> >> 在 2026/9/22 09:21, Hyunchul Lee 写道: >>> Hi Baolin, >>> >>> 2026년 9월 20일 (일) 오후 5:32, Baolin Liu 님이 작성: >>>> >>>> From: Baolin Liu >>>> >>>> Add a fileattr setter for immutable and store its state in bit 0 of a >>>> little-endian u32 in the private $LXFLAGS EA. Reuse the standard NTFS EA >>>> attributes and restore the flag when loading an inode, so eviction and >>>> unmount do not discard the setting. >>> >>> >>> I think that the name $LXFLAGS is not appropriate. the prefix $LX >>> seems to be a WSL-owned namespace. The name could cause >>> confusion or a future semantics collision with Windows WSL. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Hyunchul >> >> Hi Hyunchul, >> >> Thanks for pointing this out. I agree that we should avoid the $LX >> prefix to prevent confusion or a future semantics collision with WSL. >> >> Would $LINUXFLAGS be an acceptable name for this private EA? >> >> If you agree, I'll update the code and documentation, rerun the >> relevant tests, including the Windows NTFS and CHKDSK compatibility >> tests with the new name, and submit the revised patches as v4. > > I agree. And others look good to me. > Feel free to add my review tag for this patch set. > > Reviewed-by: Hyunchul Lee Hi Hyunchul, Thanks for your reply. I'll add your Reviewed-by tag to the v4 series. Thanks, Baolin. > >> >> I look forward to your feedback. >> >> Thanks, >> Baolin. >> > >