mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com>
To: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
	"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>,
	"Matthew Brost" <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
	"Philipp Stanner" <phasta@kernel.org>,
	"Pierre-Eric Pelloux-Prayer" <pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-dev@igalia.com, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sched: Increase drm_mock_sched_job_wait_finished timeout when CONFIG_HZ=100
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 09:49:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4f017cc-3dbf-416c-b456-0c19d2f0647a@igalia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260913084155.520015-2-david@davidgow.net>


On 13/09/2026 09:41, David Gow wrote:
> The drm_sched_scheduler_overhead_tests tests hardcode a timeout of 5x
> total_us, and fail if it's exceeded. However, on systems with
> CONFIG_HZ < 250, this tends to fail.

Systems plural or just UML? I suppose if no hrtimer support and low HZ 
it is plausible since executing the tests needs 1000 x 1ms hrtimer 
callbacks to fire.

Anyway, increasing the tolerance is okay-ish, with the -ish part being 
that it would be even better to skip if test could know before hand on a 
particular system it would be uselessly slow. Hence I am curious whether 
it is just UML or you could point me to other specific platforms/kconfig 
combinations where you saw it fail. In which case maybe we can come up 
with a skip criteria.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> As it's possible to configure many architectures to use 100 Hz (and some,
> such as UML, hardcode CONFIG_HZ=100), increase the timeout so that the test
> doesn't fail on these configurations.
> 
> Fixes: 97ef806a5314 ("drm/sched: Add some scheduling quality unit tests")
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <david@davidgow.net>
> ---
> 
> This failure showed up on UML when testing the addition of CONFIG_DRM to
> the KUnit 'alltests' config[1]. Ideally, I'd like to see this test fixed
> (or at least skipped/disabled) on these broken configurations so that the
> alltests run is clean. (I don't actually run any CONFIG_HZ=100 configs
> other than UML, but fixing them all is ideal if we can manage it.)
> 
> If you'd rather a different implementation / magic number, let me know.
> I picked 15 here as it gave me plenty of leeway: 10 worked most, but not
> all, of the time under i386 qemu w/ CONFIG_HZ_100, and was fine with UML
> on this machine.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- David
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260911-kunit-drm-v1-1-c5c0f18fc7b0@kernel.org/
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/tests_scheduler.c | 11 +++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/tests_scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/tests_scheduler.c
> index 285546a2218f..02c83b5c2189 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/tests_scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/tests/tests_scheduler.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,13 @@
>    * logic.
>    */
>   
> +/* We need a more generous timeout when CONFIG_HZ=100. */
> +#if CONFIG_HZ < 250
> +#define TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER 15
> +#else
> +#define TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER 5
> +#endif
> +
>   static int drm_sched_scheduler_init(struct kunit *test)
>   {
>   	struct drm_mock_scheduler *sched;
> @@ -88,7 +95,7 @@ static void drm_sched_scheduler_queue_overhead(struct kunit *test)
>   
>   	/* Wait with a safe margin to avoid every failing. */
>   	done = drm_mock_sched_job_wait_finished(job,
> -						usecs_to_jiffies(total_us) * 5);
> +						usecs_to_jiffies(total_us) * TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER);
>   	end = ktime_get();
>   	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, done);
>   
> @@ -149,7 +156,7 @@ static void drm_sched_scheduler_ping_pong(struct kunit *test)
>   
>   	/* Wait with a safe margin to avoid every failing. */
>   	done = drm_mock_sched_job_wait_finished(job,
> -						usecs_to_jiffies(total_us) * 5);
> +						usecs_to_jiffies(total_us) * TIMEOUT_MULTIPLIER);
>   	end = ktime_get();
>   	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, done);
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-14  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-13  8:41 David Gow
2026-09-14  8:49 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2026-09-14 10:06   ` David Gow
2026-09-14 11:21     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-09-14 11:48       ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-14 12:12         ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2026-09-14 13:33           ` David Gow
2026-09-14  9:03 ` Philipp Stanner
2026-09-14 10:07   ` David Gow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b4f017cc-3dbf-416c-b456-0c19d2f0647a@igalia.com \
    --to=tvrtko.ursulin@igalia.com \
    --cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@davidgow.net \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kernel-dev@igalia.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
    --cc=phasta@kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre-eric.pelloux-prayer@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®