From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Cc: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] KVM: VMX: Handle RFLAGS.TF in skip_emulated_instruction
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:19:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4f7b9ae-0a5a-b7fe-deb6-750933c1ca18@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP045ApB3p+xNOhs6qUcOBTWMybQ81nq=47r4eEmjuNs0E_WYw@mail.gmail.com>
On 28/11/2016 17:13, Kyle Huey wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 3:42 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
>> This code is pretty much the same as kvm_vcpu_check_singlestep. Let's
>> not duplicate the code and implement skip_emulated_instruction can be
>> implemented in x86.c, like
>>
>> unsigned long rflags = kvm_x86_ops->get_rflags(vcpu);
>> int r = EMULATE_DONE;
>>
>> /* This would be the no_trap variant */
>> kvm_x86_ops->skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>> kvm_vcpu_check_singlestep(vcpu, rflags, &r);
>> return r == EMULATE_DONE;
>>
>> (because x86.c/vmx.c/svm.c are separate modules, when moving the function
>> to x86.c you should rename it to kvm_skip_emulated_instruction).
>>
>> Paolo
>
> They're not exactly the same. For some reason I don't understand
> kvm_vcpu_check_singlestep clears the trap flag. Perhaps that is also
> a bug?
The Intel manual says "The processor clears the TF flag before calling
the exception handler" (17.3.1.4), so I think you should do it too.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-28 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-28 4:18 [PATCH 0/5] KVM: VMX: Fix single stepping with emulated instructions Kyle Huey
2016-11-28 4:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] KVM: x86: Add a return value to kvm_emulate_cpuid Kyle Huey
2016-11-28 4:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] KVM: VMX: Reorder some skip_emulated_instruction calls Kyle Huey
2016-11-28 4:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] KVM: VMX: Move skip_emulated_instruction out of nested_vmx_check_vmcs12 Kyle Huey
2016-11-28 4:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] KVM: x86: Add a return value to skip_emulated_instruction and propagate it Kyle Huey
2016-11-28 4:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] KVM: VMX: Handle RFLAGS.TF in skip_emulated_instruction Kyle Huey
2016-11-28 11:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-11-28 16:13 ` Kyle Huey
2016-11-28 17:19 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2016-11-28 18:34 ` Kyle Huey
2016-11-28 22:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4f7b9ae-0a5a-b7fe-deb6-750933c1ca18@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@kylehuey.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®