From: liubaolin <liubaolin12138@163.com>
To: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>,
Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
Yuezhang Mo <yuezhang.mo@sony.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
exfat@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ntfs: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 20:04:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b51a2ffa-5778-4075-a679-84cd3acf419a@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924110544.601390-3-yaojiale02@163.com>
在 2026/9/24 19:05, Jiale Yao 写道:
> An asynchronous direct write can remain in flight after the inode lock is
> released. If another direct write falls back to buffered I/O while the
> first write is still pending, iomap_file_buffered_write() can dirty pages
> before the first write completes its post-I/O page cache invalidation.
> The invalidation then finds dirty pages, reports a page cache invalidation
> failure, and records -EIO in the mapping error sequence. A later fsync()
> therefore returns -EIO.
>
> Commit 15cdefd0c0522f9d5e12d947fa04f4c11649b699 ("ext4: drain
> in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback") fixed the same race in
> ext4. NTFS has an equivalent fallback after iomap_dio_rw() returns
> -ENOTBLK or a short write, but does not drain other in-flight DIO before
> dirtying the page cache.
>
> Wait for in-flight DIO before calling iomap_file_buffered_write() in the
> fallback path.
>
> A reproducer using concurrent AIO direct writes and buffered fallback
> triggered the following warning and made a subsequent fsync() return
> -EIO:
>
> Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O. Possible data corruption
> due to collision with buffered I/O!
>
> Fixes: 9c87959601e8 ("ntfs: update file operations")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260629113827.4074335-3-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com
> Signed-off-by: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
> ---
> fs/ntfs/file.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ntfs/file.c b/fs/ntfs/file.c
> index 007d1614b9ac..2fc2ffde3846 100644
> --- a/fs/ntfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ntfs/file.c
> @@ -527,6 +527,13 @@ static ssize_t ntfs_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>
> offset = iocb->ki_pos;
> iocb->ki_flags &= ~IOCB_DIRECT;
> +
> + /*
> + * Prevent concurrent direct I/O and buffered I/O to the same file
> + * range. Wait for in-flight DIO to finish before dirtying pages.
> + */
> + inode_dio_wait(file_inode(iocb->ki_filp));
Hi Jiale,
This fallback path can still have IOCB_NOWAIT set, but
inode_dio_wait() blocks when there is outstanding DIO. Clearing
IOCB_DIRECT does not clear IOCB_NOWAIT.
In comparison, ext4_buffered_write_iter() rejects NOWAIT requests
before reaching the wait.
Could we also handle IOCB_NOWAIT before entering this potentially
blocking fallback?
If no bytes have been written, we can return -EAGAIN; if some DIO has
already completed, we should preserve the positive short-write result.
Thanks,
Baolin.
> +
> written = iomap_file_buffered_write(iocb, from,
> &ntfs_write_iomap_ops, &ntfs_iomap_folio_ops,
> NULL);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 11:05 [PATCH 0/3] fs: " Jiale Yao
2026-09-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext2: " Jiale Yao
2026-09-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] ntfs: " Jiale Yao
2026-09-24 12:04 ` liubaolin [this message]
2026-09-24 12:20 ` jiale yao
2026-09-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] exfat: " Jiale Yao
[not found] <20260924105125.577714-1-yaojiale02@163.com>
2026-09-24 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] ntfs: " Jiale Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b51a2ffa-5778-4075-a679-84cd3acf419a@163.com \
--to=liubaolin12138@163.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=exfat@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ntfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=yaojiale02@163.com \
--cc=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®