From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Wenjie Qi <qwjhust@gmail.com>, jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: chao@kernel.org, daeho43@gmail.com, daehojeong@google.com,
sunqiuyang@huawei.com, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qiwenjie@xiaomi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2026 19:05:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b52ee3f7-e849-4444-b870-7f9ec87f8541@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <226abf7d629d7345f450753a42e924b436c99ec0.1792116883.git.qiwenjie@xiaomi.com>
On 10/16/26 13:44, Wenjie Qi wrote:
> Online shrink updates MAIN_SECS() but leaves resizable_tail_secno and
> pinned_area_max_secno unchanged. The pinned allocation limit can exceed
> the new main area when shrinking beyond the reserved tail.
>
> Consume the reserved tail by the number of removed sections, clamping
> it to zero, before refreshing the shared pinned allocation boundary.
> This preserves the boundary while shrinking within the reservation and
> limits it to the new main area otherwise, retaining the zoned limit.
>
> Save the old tail count and restore it before rolling back the geometry
> if the final checkpoint fails.
>
> Also bound pinned section allocation by the current MAIN_SECS(). Range
> evacuation temporarily reduces it before moving cursegs, while the
> cached pinned boundary still describes the old geometry. Otherwise, a
> pinned curseg can be reallocated into the range being removed.
>
> Fixes: c966d29e01bb ("f2fs: support resizable tail section and unify pinned allocation")
> Suggested-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenjie Qi <qiwenjie@xiaomi.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Thanks,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-19 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 5:44 [PATCH v4 0/2] f2fs: fix online resize state Wenjie Qi
2026-10-16 5:44 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] f2fs: flush SIT journal during filesystem resize Wenjie Qi
2026-10-19 9:57 ` Chao Yu
2026-10-16 5:44 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] f2fs: refresh pinned allocation boundary after resize Wenjie Qi
2026-10-16 13:50 ` Daeho Jeong
2026-10-19 11:05 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2026-10-19 15:40 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] f2fs: fix online resize state patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b52ee3f7-e849-4444-b870-7f9ec87f8541@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=daeho43@gmail.com \
--cc=daehojeong@google.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qiwenjie@xiaomi.com \
--cc=qwjhust@gmail.com \
--cc=sunqiuyang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®