mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use bio::remaining for async checksumming synchronization
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 07:32:07 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b54b679d-18c7-492e-a4fa-ce797c0748fa@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902165137.3781696-3-neelx@suse.com>



在 2026/9/3 02:21, Daniel Vacek 写道:
> We can use bio::remaining counter to sync the offloaded checksuming.
> As a result we can slim down the btrfs_bio structure by 24 bytes
> and simplify the code a bit.
> 
> $ pahole | diff
> -	/* size: 328, cachelines: 6, members: 15 */
> +	/* size: 304, cachelines: 5, members: 14 */
> 
> Moreover this will allow us enabling async checksumming with encryption
> where we need to checksum the bounce bio instead of our regular one
> embedded in btrfs_bio. And so we need to extend it's lifetime. This is
> the preffered way to do so.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>
> ---
>   fs/btrfs/bio.c       | 4 ----
>   fs/btrfs/bio.h       | 4 ----
>   fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 6 ++----
>   3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.c b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> index 19b4855969f5..771b7d598aee 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ static struct btrfs_bio *btrfs_split_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>   	bbio->can_use_append = orig_bbio->can_use_append;
>   	bbio->is_scrub = orig_bbio->is_scrub;
>   	bbio->is_remap = orig_bbio->is_remap;
> -	bbio->async_csum = orig_bbio->async_csum;
>   
>   	atomic_inc(&orig_bbio->pending_ios);
>   	return bbio;
> @@ -114,9 +113,6 @@ void btrfs_bio_end_io(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, blk_status_t status)
>   	/* Make sure we're already in task context. */
>   	ASSERT(in_task());
>   
> -	if (bbio->async_csum)
> -		wait_for_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
> -

But what if there is still a running csum calculation at this stage?

Without waiting for the completion, we are going to get incorrect csums.

>   	bbio->bio.bi_status = status;
>   	if (bbio->bio.bi_pool == &btrfs_clone_bioset) {
>   		struct btrfs_bio *orig_bbio = bbio->private;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.h b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> index b7bd377a0162..bbf362b8668b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ struct btrfs_bio {
>   			struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
>   			struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums;
>   			struct work_struct csum_work;
> -			struct completion csum_done;
>   			struct bvec_iter csum_saved_iter;
>   			u64 orig_physical;
>   			u64 orig_logical;
> @@ -93,9 +92,6 @@ struct btrfs_bio {
>   	/* Whether the bio is coming from copy_remapped_data_io(). */
>   	bool is_remap:1;
>   
> -	/* Whether the csum generation for data write is async. */
> -	bool async_csum:1;
> -
>   	/* Whether the bio is written using zone append. */
>   	bool can_use_append:1;
>   
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> index 5a5cffb18922..50dcd448d936 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> @@ -817,9 +817,8 @@ static void csum_one_bio_work(struct work_struct *work)
>   	struct btrfs_bio *bbio = container_of(work, struct btrfs_bio, csum_work);
>   
>   	ASSERT(btrfs_op(&bbio->bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE);
> -	ASSERT(bbio->async_csum == true);
>   	csum_one_bio(bbio, &bbio->csum_saved_iter);
> -	complete(&bbio->csum_done);
> +	bio_endio(&bbio->bio);
>   }
>   
>   /*
> @@ -854,8 +853,7 @@ int btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, bool async)
>   		csum_one_bio(bbio, &iter);
>   		return 0;
>   	}
> -	init_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
> -	bbio->async_csum = true;
> +	bio_inc_remaining(bio);
>   	bbio->csum_saved_iter = bio->bi_iter;
>   	INIT_WORK(&bbio->csum_work, csum_one_bio_work);
>   	schedule_work(&bbio->csum_work);


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 22:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02 16:51 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: async checksumming cleanups Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 16:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: consume the given iter directly instead of copying in csum_one_bio() Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 21:51   ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-02 22:47     ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-03  4:49   ` Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use bio::remaining for async checksumming synchronization Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 22:02   ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2026-09-02 22:20     ` Qu Wenruo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b54b679d-18c7-492e-a4fa-ce797c0748fa@gmx.com \
    --to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=neelx@suse.com \
    --cc=wqu@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®