From: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com>
To: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use bio::remaining for async checksumming synchronization
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 07:32:07 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b54b679d-18c7-492e-a4fa-ce797c0748fa@gmx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902165137.3781696-3-neelx@suse.com>
在 2026/9/3 02:21, Daniel Vacek 写道:
> We can use bio::remaining counter to sync the offloaded checksuming.
> As a result we can slim down the btrfs_bio structure by 24 bytes
> and simplify the code a bit.
>
> $ pahole | diff
> - /* size: 328, cachelines: 6, members: 15 */
> + /* size: 304, cachelines: 5, members: 14 */
>
> Moreover this will allow us enabling async checksumming with encryption
> where we need to checksum the bounce bio instead of our regular one
> embedded in btrfs_bio. And so we need to extend it's lifetime. This is
> the preffered way to do so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/bio.c | 4 ----
> fs/btrfs/bio.h | 4 ----
> fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 6 ++----
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.c b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> index 19b4855969f5..771b7d598aee 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.c
> @@ -103,7 +103,6 @@ static struct btrfs_bio *btrfs_split_bio(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> bbio->can_use_append = orig_bbio->can_use_append;
> bbio->is_scrub = orig_bbio->is_scrub;
> bbio->is_remap = orig_bbio->is_remap;
> - bbio->async_csum = orig_bbio->async_csum;
>
> atomic_inc(&orig_bbio->pending_ios);
> return bbio;
> @@ -114,9 +113,6 @@ void btrfs_bio_end_io(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, blk_status_t status)
> /* Make sure we're already in task context. */
> ASSERT(in_task());
>
> - if (bbio->async_csum)
> - wait_for_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
> -
But what if there is still a running csum calculation at this stage?
Without waiting for the completion, we are going to get incorrect csums.
> bbio->bio.bi_status = status;
> if (bbio->bio.bi_pool == &btrfs_clone_bioset) {
> struct btrfs_bio *orig_bbio = bbio->private;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.h b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> index b7bd377a0162..bbf362b8668b 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ struct btrfs_bio {
> struct btrfs_ordered_extent *ordered;
> struct btrfs_ordered_sum *sums;
> struct work_struct csum_work;
> - struct completion csum_done;
> struct bvec_iter csum_saved_iter;
> u64 orig_physical;
> u64 orig_logical;
> @@ -93,9 +92,6 @@ struct btrfs_bio {
> /* Whether the bio is coming from copy_remapped_data_io(). */
> bool is_remap:1;
>
> - /* Whether the csum generation for data write is async. */
> - bool async_csum:1;
> -
> /* Whether the bio is written using zone append. */
> bool can_use_append:1;
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> index 5a5cffb18922..50dcd448d936 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> @@ -817,9 +817,8 @@ static void csum_one_bio_work(struct work_struct *work)
> struct btrfs_bio *bbio = container_of(work, struct btrfs_bio, csum_work);
>
> ASSERT(btrfs_op(&bbio->bio) == BTRFS_MAP_WRITE);
> - ASSERT(bbio->async_csum == true);
> csum_one_bio(bbio, &bbio->csum_saved_iter);
> - complete(&bbio->csum_done);
> + bio_endio(&bbio->bio);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -854,8 +853,7 @@ int btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, bool async)
> csum_one_bio(bbio, &iter);
> return 0;
> }
> - init_completion(&bbio->csum_done);
> - bbio->async_csum = true;
> + bio_inc_remaining(bio);
> bbio->csum_saved_iter = bio->bi_iter;
> INIT_WORK(&bbio->csum_work, csum_one_bio_work);
> schedule_work(&bbio->csum_work);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 16:51 [PATCH 0/2] btrfs: async checksumming cleanups Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 16:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: consume the given iter directly instead of copying in csum_one_bio() Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 21:51 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-02 22:47 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-09-03 4:49 ` Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: use bio::remaining for async checksumming synchronization Daniel Vacek
2026-09-02 22:02 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2026-09-02 22:20 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b54b679d-18c7-492e-a4fa-ce797c0748fa@gmx.com \
--to=quwenruo.btrfs@gmx.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mason@kernel.org \
--cc=neelx@suse.com \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®