From: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
To: Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@gmail.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>,
ajones@ventanamicro.com, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@ventanamicro.com>,
Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarboza@ventanamicro.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
Minda Chen <minda.chen@starfivetech.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>, Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Change vcpu_has_ext to a common function
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 12:29:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b5673bce-09e7-4531-a074-e252aa9e38e8@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJve8omCZxsiP1jF0n5SBh0_U6q7Exj5A1ACFahWpdBoxohaMA@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/21/24 05:08, Haibo Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 4:37 PM Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/20/24 18:13, Haibo Xu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 7:03 AM Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 1:48 AM Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Move vcpu_has_ext to the processor.c and rename it to __vcpu_has_ext
>>>>> so that other test cases can use it for vCPU extension check.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h | 2 ++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/get-reg-list.c | 11 +----------
>>>>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h
>>>>> index b68b1b731a34..bd27e1c67579 100644
>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h
>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/riscv/processor.h
>>>>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ static inline uint64_t __kvm_reg_id(uint64_t type, uint64_t idx,
>>>>> #define RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(idx) __kvm_reg_id(KVM_REG_RISCV_ISA_EXT, \
>>>>> idx, KVM_REG_SIZE_ULONG)
>>>>>
>>>>> +bool __vcpu_has_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ext);
>>>>> +
>>>>> struct ex_regs {
>>>>> unsigned long ra;
>>>>> unsigned long sp;
>>>>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c
>>>>> index 39a1e9902dec..dad73ce18164 100644
>>>>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c
>>>>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/riscv/processor.c
>>>>> @@ -15,6 +15,16 @@
>>>>>
>>>>> static vm_vaddr_t exception_handlers;
>>>>>
>>>>> +bool __vcpu_has_ext(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int ext)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + unsigned long value = 0;
>>>>> + int ret;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + ret = __vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(ext), &value);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + return !ret && !!value;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Not sure what was the base patch on which this was rebased. The actual
>>>> commit in the queue branch looks different.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This patch set was based on 6.7-rc8.
>>>
>>>> https://github.com/kvm-riscv/linux/commit/5563517cc2012e3326411b360c9924d3f2706c8d
>>>>
>>>> Both seem to have the same bug though the tests fail now and require
>>>> the following fix.
>>>> The ext id should be uint64_t and we need to pass ext directly so that
>>>> SBI extension tests can also pass.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It's weird that 6.7-rc8 has already included Andrew's change on the ISA ext reg,
>>> but this patch was not generated against his change.
>>>
>>> commit bdf6aa328f137e184b0fce607fd585354c3742f1
>>> Author: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
>>> Date: Wed Dec 13 18:09:58 2023 +0100
>>>
>>> RISC-V: KVM: selftests: Treat SBI ext regs like ISA ext regs
>>>
>>> Anyway, your changes were right. Please go ahead to include them when merging.
>>>
>>
>> I am not sure what happened. Probably, a merge conflict issue.
>>
>> I just realized I forgot to copy paste another fix in arch timer
>>
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/riscv/arch_timer.c
>> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ struct kvm_vm *test_vm_create(void)
>> int nr_vcpus = test_args.nr_vcpus;
>>
>> vm = vm_create_with_vcpus(nr_vcpus, guest_code, vcpus);
>> - __TEST_REQUIRE(__vcpu_has_ext(vcpus[0], KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC),
>> + __TEST_REQUIRE(__vcpu_has_ext(vcpus[0],
>> RISCV_ISA_EXT_REG(KVM_RISCV_ISA_EXT_SSTC)),
>>
>
> Right Fix!
> Please let me know if I need to rebase this patch series on your tree
> and resent it.
>
That's Anup's call.
> Thanks,
> Haibo
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-21 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-22 9:58 [PATCH v5 00/12] RISCV: Add kvm Sstc timer selftests Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 01/12] selftests/kvm: Fix issues with $(SPLIT_TESTS) Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 02/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Data type cleanup for arch_timer test Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 12:21 ` Andrew Jones
2024-01-22 13:08 ` Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 03/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Enable tuning of error margin in " Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 04/12] KVM: arm64: selftests: Split arch_timer test code Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 05/12] KVM: selftests: Add CONFIG_64BIT definition for the build Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 06/12] tools: riscv: Add header file csr.h Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 07/12] tools: riscv: Add header file vdso/processor.h Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 08/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Switch to use macro from csr.h Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 09/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add exception handling support Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 10/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add guest helper to get vcpu id Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 11/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Change vcpu_has_ext to a common function Haibo Xu
2024-02-20 23:03 ` Atish Patra
2024-02-21 2:13 ` Haibo Xu
2024-02-21 8:37 ` Atish Patra
2024-02-21 13:08 ` Haibo Xu
2024-02-21 20:29 ` Atish Patra [this message]
2024-02-26 5:19 ` Anup Patel
2024-02-26 5:47 ` Haibo Xu
2024-01-22 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 12/12] KVM: riscv: selftests: Add sstc timer test Haibo Xu
2024-02-05 13:10 ` [PATCH v5 00/12] RISCV: Add kvm Sstc timer selftests Haibo Xu
2024-02-05 16:24 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-02-06 1:32 ` Haibo Xu
2024-02-12 12:23 ` Anup Patel
2024-02-18 6:41 ` Haibo Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b5673bce-09e7-4531-a074-e252aa9e38e8@rivosinc.com \
--to=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=dbarboza@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=guoren@kernel.org \
--cc=haibo1.xu@intel.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maciej.wieczor-retman@intel.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mchitale@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=minda.chen@starfivetech.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=xiaobo55x@gmail.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®