From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751793AbeB0Vok (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:44:40 -0500 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:47996 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751675AbeB0Voj (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:44:39 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] pvcalls-front: 64-bit align flags To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: jgross@suse.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: From: Boris Ostrovsky Message-ID: Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:45:08 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8817 signatures=668681 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1802270268 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/27/2018 04:32 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >> On 02/27/2018 02:54 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> We are using test_and_* operations on the status and flag fields of >>> struct sock_mapping. However, these functions require the operand to be >>> 64-bit aligned on arm64. Currently, only status is 64-bit aligned. >>> >>> Make flags 64-bit aligned by introducing an explicit padding field. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c >>> index ca5b773..aa07b2a 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c >>> +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-front.c >>> @@ -78,6 +78,7 @@ struct sock_mapping { >>> #define PVCALLS_STATUS_BIND 1 >>> #define PVCALLS_STATUS_LISTEN 2 >>> uint8_t status; >>> + uint8_t pad[7]; >> Does this guarantee alignment (for either status or flag)? > Yes: status is part of a struct and a union. Unions and structs have the > alignment of their most aligned type. In this case they are 64-bit > aligned, as some of the fields are pointers. > > The padding makes sure that flags is 1+7 bytes from it. OK. What about adding __attribute__((aligned(8))) to both (with a comment explaining reasoning)? -boris > > >>> /* >>> * Internal state-machine flags. >>> * Only one accept operation can be inflight for a socket.