From: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 6.10-rc2 - massive performance regression
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2024 18:28:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6083a4c-44be-c90d-bb41-c48e130503b9@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjwFGQZcDinK=BkEaA8FSyVg5NaUe0BobxowxeZ5PvetA@mail.gmail.com>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jun 2024 at 14:36, David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com> wrote:
>> I'll try to remember how to bisect through the merge :-)
> git bisect should just do all the work for you. All you need to do is
> give a know good and bad point, and keep testing what git bisect asks
> you to do.
>
>> I've done some tests.
>> I'm seeing a three-fold slow down on:
>> $ i=0; while [ $i -lt 1000000 ]; do i=$((i + 1)); done
>> which goes from 1 second to 3.
>>
>> I can run that with ftrace monitoring scheduler events (and a few
>> other things) and can't spot anywhere the process isn't running
>> for a significant time.
> Sounds like cpu frequency. Almost certainly hw-specific. I went
> through that on my Threadripper in the 6.9 timeframe, but I'm not
> seeing any issues in this current release.
>
> If you bisect it, we have somebody to blame and point fingers at...
>
> Linus
>
I have run a quick test on my laptop doing
time (i=0; while [ $i -lt 1000000 ]; do i=$((i+1)); done)
and 6.8.12, 6.9.3 and 6.10-rc2 have identical results...
Woody
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-08 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-02 22:50 Linux 6.10-rc2 Linus Torvalds
2024-06-03 7:03 ` Build regressions/improvements in v6.10-rc2 Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-06-08 14:44 ` Linux 6.10-rc2 - massive performance regression David Laight
2024-06-08 16:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-08 21:35 ` David Laight
2024-06-08 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-06-08 22:28 ` Woody Suwalski [this message]
2024-06-09 8:07 ` Johan Hovold
2024-06-09 8:11 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-06-09 9:35 ` David Laight
2024-06-09 14:24 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6083a4c-44be-c90d-bb41-c48e130503b9@gmail.com \
--to=terraluna977@gmail.com \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®