mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
Cc: Jacky Chou <jacky_chou@aspeedtech.com>,
	hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net,
	edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	joel@jms.id.au, f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: mdio: aspeed: Add dummy read for fire control
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 14:44:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6155c5f-3012-42d1-90dc-8ef39d1eef2d@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d28177c9152408d77840992f2b76efe3cb675b7a.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:13:11PM +1030, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-11-19 at 17:51 +0800, Jacky Chou wrote:
> > When the command bus is sometimes busy, it may cause the command is
> > not
> > arrived to MDIO controller immediately. On software, the driver
> > issues a
> > write command to the command bus does not wait for command complete
> > and
> > it returned back to code immediately. But a read command will wait
> > for
> > the data back, once a read command was back indicates the previous
> > write
> > command had arrived to controller.
> > Add a dummy read to ensure triggering mdio controller before starting
> > polling the status of mdio controller to avoid polling unexpected
> > timeout.
> 
> Why use the explicit dummy read rather than adjust the poll interval or
> duration? I still don't think that's been adequately explained given
> the hardware-clear of the fire bit on completion, which is what we're
> polling for.

I'm guessing here, but if the hardware has not received the write, the
read could return an indication that the hardware is idle, and so the
poll exits immediately. The returned value of the first read need to
be ignored. It is simpler and more reliable to do that with an
explicit read, rather than try to play with the poll timing.

AS i said, a guess. We need a good commit message explaining the
reality of what is happening here.

	Andrew

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-20 13:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-19  9:51 Jacky Chou
2024-11-19 13:55 ` Andrew Lunn
2024-11-20  2:34   ` 回覆: " Jacky Chou
2024-11-20  4:43 ` Andrew Jeffery
2024-11-20  5:45   ` 回覆: " Jacky Chou
2024-11-20 13:44   ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2024-11-21  4:29     ` Andrew Jeffery
2024-11-20  9:42 ` Russell King (Oracle)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b6155c5f-3012-42d1-90dc-8ef39d1eef2d@lunn.ch \
    --to=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=jacky_chou@aspeedtech.com \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®