Re: [RESEND PATCH can-next 1/2] can: tcan4x5x: Rename parse_config function

[Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>]

Mark and Wolfgang

On 4/28/20 2:48 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Marc
>
> On 2/27/20 12:38 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Rename the tcan4x5x_parse_config function to tcan4x5x_get_gpios since
>> the function retrieves the gpio configurations from the firmware.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@ti.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 4 ++--
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c 
>> b/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>> index 9821babef55e..37d53ecc560b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c
>> @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int tcan4x5x_disable_state(struct 
>> m_can_classdev *cdev)
>>                     TCAN4X5X_DISABLE_INH_MSK, 0x01);
>>   }
>>   -static int tcan4x5x_parse_config(struct m_can_classdev *cdev)
>> +static int tcan4x5x_get_gpios(struct m_can_classdev *cdev)
>>   {
>>       struct tcan4x5x_priv *tcan4x5x = cdev->device_data;
>>       int ret;
>> @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static int tcan4x5x_can_probe(struct spi_device 
>> *spi)
>>       if (ret)
>>           return ret;
>>   -    ret = tcan4x5x_parse_config(mcan_class);
>> +    ret = tcan4x5x_get_gpios(mcan_class);
>>       if (ret)
>>           goto out_power;
>
> I noticed this series never was reviewed and applied.  They are still 
> applicable and were requested changes.
>
Did you need me to combine all the patches on a m_can-next branch and 
submit a PR after test?

There are quite a few patches out there and they all seem relevant.

Dan


> Dan
>