From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@linux.ibm.com>
To: netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org
Cc: Aswin Karuvally <aswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerd Bayer <gbayer@linux.ibm.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Julian Ruess <julianr@linux.ibm.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] s390/ism: Zerorize dmb at allocation
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 09:59:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6352a09-c9d8-44ee-850d-24731bdda69e@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179060878011.31693.9560616938197921438@kernel.org>
On 28.09.26 17:19, netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This is an automated message. This series looks like a fix, but its
> commit messages seem to be missing some information:
>
> - Whether the issue was actually triggered, or is only theoretical
> (e.g. found by code inspection). If it was triggered please include
> the symptoms, like the stack trace or error messages.
>
> Please do not repost the series just to address the above. Instead,
> reply to this email with the missing information, so that reviewers
> can take it into account. If the series needs another revision for
> other reasons, please include the information in the commit messages
> then.
>
> The evaluation is done by an LLM so it may be wrong, if you think
> that is the case please reply and explain.
For reference:
On 28.09.26 17:14, Alexandra Winter wrote:
> Sashiko reported [1] that 'Missing __GFP_ZERO in folio_alloc() causes
> uninitialized kernel memory to be exposed in the receive message buffer'.
> An ism dmb is receive-only, so the data is not leaked to a remote peer. In
> general the smc kernel module (dibs client) will only push newly received
> data to userspace. We still should not have uninitialized data in a receive
> buffer.
As mentioned in the commit message this issue was reported by Sashiko and found
valid by me. I do not see a simple reproducer.
Alexandra
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-28 15:14 Alexandra Winter
2026-09-28 15:19 ` netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-09-29 7:59 ` Alexandra Winter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6352a09-c9d8-44ee-850d-24731bdda69e@linux.ibm.com \
--to=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=aswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gbayer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=julianr@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sinfo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®