From: "Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@gmail.com>
To: "Alan Jenkins" <aj504@cs.york.ac.uk>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
"Alexey Starikovskiy" <astarikovskiy@suse.de>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:26:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b637ec0b0807200026j3a2694acw7c964e1c23a7b57c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50b515e4-6cd1-4b18-93e3-ecfab5925f02@34g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Well, I read in another thread that there are some issues with this
patches. Anyway, I'm now running .26 with your patch since yesterday,
tried 3 suspend/resume cycles and 2 hibernate/resume cycles and
everything seems to be fine.
It looks that it's really solving the problem for me.
Thanks for your work. Cheers,
Fabio
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Alan Jenkins <aj504@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote:
> Fabio Comolli wrote:
>> Hi Alex.
>> Well, I read the bug report but still can't understand why in any
>> kernels < 2.6.26 I don't have any problems with battery reports and in
>> 2.6.26 as soon as the message appears g-p-m starts to behave
>> incorrectly.
>>
>> Anyway, I got back to 25.11 for now, if you have any other workarounds
>> for me to test please let me know.
>
> Hi Fabio.
>
> I wrote some GPE fixes for my Asus laptop and they need some wider
> testing :-). I think I found why we get GPE storms and how to deal
> with them.
>
> I posted them on the lists a series of three patches, but I neglected
> to CC any potential testers. For convenience I squished them into a
> single patch and posted them in Bugzilla.
>
> My bug: <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11089>
> Patch: <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?
> id=16886&action=view>
>
> The risky part of the fixes removes the GPE interrupt storm check and
> the GPE polling mode. So you won't see the "disabling EC GPE" message,
> and I'm hoping this will stop g-p-m misbehaving for you.
>
> I'm not sure what could happen if it's broken somehow :-). If you
> have ACPI hotkeys (i.e. running acpi_listen shows events when you
> press hotkeys), please check they still work. If not, you should have
> at least one button that generates an ACPI event - the power button.
> So it would be great if you could check the power button still works
> as normal. (On my computer, g-p-m handles the power button and pops
> up a logout/shutdown prompt).
>
> Thanks
> Alan
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-20 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <aPfh5-7kW-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <aPfhe-7kW-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <aQUio-2qG-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <aR0nM-6kd-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <aR3vi-3MV-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <aR4Ur-6c7-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <aReqy-5vm-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2008-07-19 12:22 ` Alan Jenkins
2008-07-19 12:30 ` Guillaume Chazarain
2008-07-20 7:26 ` Fabio Comolli [this message]
2008-07-13 17:59 2.6.26-rc9-git12: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-13 18:00 ` [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-13 19:34 ` Justin Mattock
2008-07-13 19:52 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-13 20:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-07-13 20:48 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-07-13 20:53 ` Justin Mattock
2008-07-18 9:17 ` Fabio Comolli
2008-07-18 15:40 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-07-18 16:23 ` Justin Mattock
2008-07-18 19:05 ` Fabio Comolli
2008-07-18 20:37 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2008-07-19 6:42 ` Fabio Comolli
2008-07-19 6:56 ` Justin Mattock
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-06 11:39 2.6.26-rc9: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-06 11:45 ` [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-07-06 17:44 ` Justin Mattock
2008-06-29 18:15 2.6.26-rc8: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-29 18:18 ` [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-29 20:30 ` Justin Mattock
2008-06-22 17:49 2.6.26-rc7-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-22 17:54 ` [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-22 21:12 ` Justin Mattock
2008-06-14 20:04 2.6.26-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-14 20:12 ` [Bug 10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-14 22:29 ` Justin Mattock
2008-06-07 20:38 2.6.26-rc5-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.25 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-06-07 20:42 ` [Bug #10724] ACPI: EC: GPE storm detected, disabling EC GPE Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b637ec0b0807200026j3a2694acw7c964e1c23a7b57c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=fabio.comolli@gmail.com \
--cc=aj504@cs.york.ac.uk \
--cc=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®