From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 8/8] arm64/hw_breakpoint: Enable FEAT_Debugv8p9
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:43:44 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b63e6914-03c6-4c76-a81a-4af2fbe557e0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <868r1st8an.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On 4/5/24 15:56, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Apr 2024 09:00:08 +0100,
> Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Currently there can be maximum 16 breakpoints, and 16 watchpoints available
>> on a given platform - as detected from ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.[BRPs|WRPs] register
>> fields. But these breakpoint, and watchpoints can be extended further up to
>> 64 via a new arch feature FEAT_Debugv8p9.
>>
>> This first enables banked access for the breakpoint and watchpoint register
>> set via MDSELR_EL1, extended exceptions via MDSCR_EL1.EMBWE and determining
>> available breakpoints and watchpoints in the platform from ID_AA64DFR1_EL1,
>> when FEAT_Debugv8p9 is enabled.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 2 +-
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++------
>> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 16 ++++++---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
>> index 13d437bcbf58..75eedba2abbe 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>> /* MDSCR_EL1 enabling bits */
>> #define DBG_MDSCR_KDE (1 << 13)
>> #define DBG_MDSCR_MDE (1 << 15)
>> -#define DBG_MDSCR_MASK ~(DBG_MDSCR_KDE | DBG_MDSCR_MDE)
>> +#define DBG_MDSCR_EMBWE (1UL << 32)
>>
>> #define DBG_ESR_EVT(x) (((x) >> 27) & 0x7)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>> index bd81cf17744a..6b9822140f71 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
>> @@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
>> * Limits.
>> * Changing these will require modifications to the register accessors.
>> */
>> -#define ARM_MAX_BRP 16
>> -#define ARM_MAX_WRP 16
>> +#define ARM_MAX_BRP 64
>> +#define ARM_MAX_WRP 64
>>
>> /* Virtual debug register bases. */
>> #define AARCH64_DBG_REG_BVR 0
>> @@ -135,22 +135,48 @@ static inline void ptrace_hw_copy_thread(struct task_struct *task)
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +static inline bool is_debug_v8p9_enabled(void)
>> +{
>> + u64 dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
>> + int dver = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_SHIFT);
>> +
>> + return dver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_V8P9;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Determine number of BRP registers available. */
>> static inline int get_num_brps(void)
>> {
>> - u64 dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
>> - return 1 +
>> - cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0,
>> - ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT);
>> + u64 dfr0, dfr1;
>> + int dver, brps;
>> +
>> + dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
>> + dver = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_SHIFT);
>> + if (dver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_V8P9) {
>> + dfr1 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1);
>> + brps = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field_width(dfr1,
>> + ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT, 8);
>> + } else {
>> + brps = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT);
>> + }
>> + return 1 + brps;
>> }
>>
>> /* Determine number of WRP registers available. */
>> static inline int get_num_wrps(void)
>> {
>> - u64 dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
>> - return 1 +
>> - cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0,
>> - ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT);
>> + u64 dfr0, dfr1;
>> + int dver, wrps;
>> +
>> + dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
>> + dver = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_SHIFT);
>> + if (dver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_V8P9) {
>> + dfr1 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1);
>> + wrps = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field_width(dfr1,
>> + ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT, 8);
>> + } else {
>> + wrps = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT);
>> + }
>> + return 1 + wrps;
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>> index 64f2ecbdfe5c..3299d1e8dc61 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>> #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
>> #include <asm/system_misc.h>
>> #include <asm/traps.h>
>> +#include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
>
> include order.
Sure, will fix the order here.
>
>>
>> /* Determine debug architecture. */
>> u8 debug_monitors_arch(void)
>> @@ -34,7 +35,7 @@ u8 debug_monitors_arch(void)
>> /*
>> * MDSCR access routines.
>> */
>> -static void mdscr_write(u32 mdscr)
>> +static void mdscr_write(u64 mdscr)
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> flags = local_daif_save();
>> @@ -43,7 +44,7 @@ static void mdscr_write(u32 mdscr)
>> }
>> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(mdscr_write);
>>
>> -static u32 mdscr_read(void)
>> +static u64 mdscr_read(void)
>> {
>> return read_sysreg(mdscr_el1);
>> }
>> @@ -76,10 +77,11 @@ early_param("nodebugmon", early_debug_disable);
>> */
>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, mde_ref_count);
>> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, kde_ref_count);
>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, embwe_ref_count);
>>
>> void enable_debug_monitors(enum dbg_active_el el)
>> {
>> - u32 mdscr, enable = 0;
>> + u64 mdscr, enable = 0;
>>
>> WARN_ON(preemptible());
>>
>> @@ -90,6 +92,9 @@ void enable_debug_monitors(enum dbg_active_el el)
>> this_cpu_inc_return(kde_ref_count) == 1)
>> enable |= DBG_MDSCR_KDE;
>>
>> + if (is_debug_v8p9_enabled() && this_cpu_inc_return(embwe_ref_count) == 1)
>> + enable |= DBG_MDSCR_EMBWE;
>> +
>> if (enable && debug_enabled) {
>> mdscr = mdscr_read();
>> mdscr |= enable;
>> @@ -100,7 +105,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(enable_debug_monitors);
>>
>> void disable_debug_monitors(enum dbg_active_el el)
>> {
>> - u32 mdscr, disable = 0;
>> + u64 mdscr, disable = 0;
>>
>> WARN_ON(preemptible());
>>
>> @@ -111,6 +116,9 @@ void disable_debug_monitors(enum dbg_active_el el)
>> this_cpu_dec_return(kde_ref_count) == 0)
>> disable &= ~DBG_MDSCR_KDE;
>>
>> + if (is_debug_v8p9_enabled() && this_cpu_dec_return(embwe_ref_count) == 0)
>> + disable &= ~DBG_MDSCR_EMBWE;
>> +
>> if (disable) {
>> mdscr = mdscr_read();
>> mdscr &= disable;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> index 2f5755192c2b..7b9169535b76 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
>> @@ -103,10 +103,40 @@ int hw_breakpoint_slots(int type)
>> WRITE_WB_REG_CASE(OFF, 14, REG, VAL); \
>> WRITE_WB_REG_CASE(OFF, 15, REG, VAL)
>>
>> +static int set_bank_index(int n)
>> +{
>> + int mdsel_bank;
>> + int bank = n / 16, index = n % 16;
>> +
>> + switch (bank) {
>> + case 0:
>> + mdsel_bank = MDSELR_EL1_BANK_BANK_0;
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + mdsel_bank = MDSELR_EL1_BANK_BANK_1;
>> + break;
>> + case 2:
>> + mdsel_bank = MDSELR_EL1_BANK_BANK_2;
>> + break;
>> + case 3:
>> + mdsel_bank = MDSELR_EL1_BANK_BANK_3;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + pr_warn("Unknown register bank %d\n", bank);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + write_sysreg_s(mdsel_bank << MDSELR_EL1_BANK_SHIFT, SYS_MDSELR_EL1);
>> + isb();
>> + return index;
>> +}
>> +
>> static u64 read_wb_reg(int reg, int n)
>> {
>> u64 val = 0;
>>
>> + if (is_debug_v8p9_enabled())
>> + n = set_bank_index(n);
>> +
>> switch (reg + n) {
>> GEN_READ_WB_REG_CASES(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BVR, AARCH64_DBG_REG_NAME_BVR, val);
>> GEN_READ_WB_REG_CASES(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BCR, AARCH64_DBG_REG_NAME_BCR, val);
>> @@ -122,6 +152,9 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(read_wb_reg);
>>
>> static void write_wb_reg(int reg, int n, u64 val)
>> {
>> + if (is_debug_v8p9_enabled())
>> + n = set_bank_index(n);
>> +
>> switch (reg + n) {
>> GEN_WRITE_WB_REG_CASES(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BVR, AARCH64_DBG_REG_NAME_BVR, val);
>> GEN_WRITE_WB_REG_CASES(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BCR, AARCH64_DBG_REG_NAME_BCR, val);
>
> Are these things guaranteed to be only used in contexts where there
> can be no interleaving of such operations? If any interleaving can
> occur, this is broken.
That is a valid concern, breakpoints and watchpoints get used in multiple
code paths such perf, ptrace etc, where preemption might cause wrong bank
to be selected before the breakpoint-watchpoint registers being read thus
impacting the state. I guess preemption should be disabled between those
two operations i.e selection of the bank and reading its registers
>
> M.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-05 8:00 [RFC 0/8] " Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05 8:00 ` [RFC 1/8] arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for MDSELR_EL1 Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05 12:52 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-05 8:00 ` [RFC 2/8] arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for HDFGRTR2_EL2 Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05 12:59 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-05 8:00 ` [RFC 3/8] arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for HDFGWTR2_EL2 Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05 13:08 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-05 8:00 ` [RFC 4/8] arm64/sysreg: Update ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 register Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05 13:16 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-05 8:00 ` [RFC 5/8] KVM: arm64: Explicitly handle MDSELR_EL1 traps as UNDEFINED Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05 10:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-12 2:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-12 11:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-16 5:46 ` Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-16 8:15 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-05 8:00 ` [RFC 6/8] arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05 8:00 ` [RFC 7/8] arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for FEAT_Debugv8p9 Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05 8:00 ` [RFC 8/8] arm64/hw_breakpoint: Enable FEAT_Debugv8p9 Anshuman Khandual
2024-04-05 10:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2024-04-16 3:13 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2024-04-16 3:54 ` [RFC 0/8] " Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b63e6914-03c6-4c76-a81a-4af2fbe557e0@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®