From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762749AbYBBADx (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:03:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761785AbYBBADp (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:03:45 -0500 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.176]:31079 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761580AbYBBADo (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:03:44 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=P13C8oSYVDQ24G94R/TOxM1YT56/hQS0PbzIcA03G3/wCmN/6JR+4k6qzNp9j6SWHeZrBqnMSsX66TYtrOsfNCikmpxzk8wDXtacLENxvRi8bBhYsaVdM9whgBvBk0GO2+R5SaTkgrRgweNP9XOaUSyX611NDYMhQ2XpYnmgStQ= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 01:03:43 +0100 From: "Dmitry Adamushko" To: "Ingo Molnar" Subject: Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git3: Major annoyance during suspend/hibernation on x86-64 (bisected) Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Peter Zijlstra" , "Steven Rostedt" , "Andrew Morton" , "Linus Torvalds" , LKML In-Reply-To: <20080201232550.GA682@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200801280226.22013.rjw@sisk.pl> <200801312154.33754.rjw@sisk.pl> <1201867497.32654.49.camel@lappy> <20080201171022.GC2159@elte.hu> <20080201224852.GA16700@elte.hu> <20080201232550.GA682@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/02/2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > > > yeah, I was already on a half-way to check it out. > > > > It does fix a problem for me. > > > > Don't forget to take along these 2 fixes from Peter's patch: > > > > - fix break usage in do_each_thread() { } while_each_thread(). > > - fix the hotplug switch stmt, a fall-through case was broken. > > Dmitry, i sent Peter's fix(es) below to Linus. Do you concur that it > fixes all the practical and theoretical problems you could see with the > code too? > One comment: any argument for waking up the 'watchdog' thread from softlockup_tick() wrt just having schedule_timeout_interruptible(HZ) in watchdog() ? (although, it's not that important). IMHO, it looks good. (I'll look again tomorrow when I'm less sleepy :-/) -- Best regards, Dmitry Adamushko