From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751610AbZKGLng (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:43:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751455AbZKGLng (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:43:36 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:62236 "EHLO mail-ew0-f228.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751343AbZKGLnf convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Nov 2009 06:43:35 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=FwAop3UzmNaJ3UJeNjnOWz7SGPGHn9vfLhAGQyAckB6mJ3ysRGcXoXB+l0ol6fD3mx TIgpjYXsoimTksunJ2pQDbiMARMy7zIeCWxGNFYb1NjJK3GP/J99h7YaDO03HBMJRdgi XeJRkjtJaNPTxUj5eGi0kc7D9nJpnmm5D/bTU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4AF46B90.8010905@sgi.com> References: <1257192776.5941.11.camel@dimm> <4AF46B90.8010905@sgi.com> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 12:43:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [ RFC, PATCH - 2/2, v2 ] x86-microcode: refactor microcode output From: Dmitry Adamushko To: Mike Travis Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Tigran Aivazian , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Andreas Mohr , Jack Steiner Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2009/11/6 Mike Travis : > > [ ... ] > >>  } >>  +static int summarize_cpu_range(cpumask_var_t range, struct cpu_signature >> *csig) > > Should be  'struct cpumask *range' > > cpumask_var_t is only to declare a local cpumask variable.  All cpumasks are > now > passed by reference (as a pointer). ok. > > With this patch the console still printed for each cpu: > > [    2.131142] mce: CPU supports 22 MCE banks > [    2.131177]  ssCC PCss ssPP ssss ssss ss > [    2.211971] mce: CPU supports 22 MCE banks > [    2.212005]  ssCC PCss ssPP ssss ssss ss > ... hmm, have you included the right log? All these messages seem to be MCE-related, not microcode... -- Dmitry