From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFD5C77B78 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 10:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234349AbjDTKMS (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:12:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54508 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234300AbjDTKLt (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:11:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.zhaoxin.com (mx2.zhaoxin.com [203.110.167.99]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28BFE9EE1 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 03:08:30 -0700 (PDT) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1681985308-1eb14e63882dfa0001-xx1T2L Received: from ZXSHMBX2.zhaoxin.com (ZXSHMBX2.zhaoxin.com [10.28.252.164]) by mx2.zhaoxin.com with ESMTP id UldYrculNOYAjf4U (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:08:28 +0800 (CST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 10.28.252.164 Received: from zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) by ZXSHMBX2.zhaoxin.com (10.28.252.164) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.16; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:08:28 +0800 Received: from [10.29.8.21] (10.29.8.21) by zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.16; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 18:08:27 +0800 X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 10.28.252.164 Message-ID: X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 10.29.8.21 Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 02:08:14 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix some issues of xHCI for zhaoxin Content-Language: en-US X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix some issues of xHCI for zhaoxin To: Greg KH CC: , , , , References: <20230420172130.375819-1-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com> From: "WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.29.8.21] X-ClientProxiedBy: ZXSHCAS1.zhaoxin.com (10.28.252.161) To zxbjmbx1.zhaoxin.com (10.29.252.163) X-Barracuda-Connect: ZXSHMBX2.zhaoxin.com[10.28.252.164] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1681985308 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 X-Barracuda-URL: https://10.28.252.36:4443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at zhaoxin.com X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 1179 X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=1.09 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12_2 X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.107673 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.01 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date 3.10 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12_2 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12_2 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/4/20 17:29, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 01:21:27AM +0800, Weitao Wang wrote: >> Fix some issues of xHCI for zhaoxin. >> >> Weitao Wang (3): >> xhci: Add a quirk for zhaoxin xhci to fix issues. >> xhci: Add zhaoxin xHCI U1/U2 feature support >> xhci: Show zhaoxin xHCI root hub speed correctly >> >> drivers/usb/host/xhci-pci.c | 5 ++++ >> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 1 + >> 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.32.0 >> > > Do these replace: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230420093603.3344-1-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com > or are they on top of them? > This [patch 2/3] and [patch 3/3] share a xhci quirk flag XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST, So I put these independent functional patch in this set group. Above url and below url are independent xHCI patch for zhaoxin. Is it more suitable to put all the patch for zhaoxin xhci in one group? I Hope to receive your guidance. Thanks! https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230420104826.4727-1-WeitaoWang-oc@zhaoxin.com/ Best Regards, Weitao > thanks, > > greg k-h > .