From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out30-112.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-112.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.112]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E6D15E8B for ; Tue, 3 Dec 2024 01:42:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.112 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733190165; cv=none; b=qSup/KpWK1qMIMif+cS2JlKByWbMjDf9LEqid5R5/5sY5YqG/odBOerzt3Iy2iiTvQd2oIHRXXi3RIzBHDHCuSguLOSiRO4FxCU7niAyvMdMXa53mvmdqKrh7tJ+HuD3jKZW6Kqnv0ACkAbq3bbZ2/Y0VoM+hnNc41Ph47goYB0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733190165; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3OuQ64WNHteqMnT/yX5B8uaYCz8jii3Me8fy5dtoNuw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=S5PwwZdSEabWVO6OVc5OO18x1Ucs6GGycCjPV0Ysmuo8GtFbJKRGxaxv7f/VlWpXCavuj8NPKdGzPXQUW8UWRC+cp4fK0LR3fZsO1MIe4qZKr2loxmzDfpP1Mk5jgzBRhnBmhXHoWGYd1dXqkBJmzJIIKSgsQb2aVTwBTbaakUA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=Co7pN6fp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.112 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="Co7pN6fp" DKIM-Signature:v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1733190155; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From:Content-Type; bh=uTUj5YMURf+KKG8f/1Sz+bcXu3/nl4aaFLZoInHn6Y8=; b=Co7pN6fpmzoWkq2XF1sFay41NTb1rQtyHdzz8qDGJPJg98beu9xX+E27mJREU9EQZMeAsGPDxnQ8aTXVq7A1rIlp5z7BU9dR7jPHcSjQlhHoPYIHXmtumcBplnNQ7T64fsU+e8CpDRA+boEd33J/1fqX6wlr0vYXJm9/LrwfDww= Received: from 30.221.129.129(mailfrom:hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0WKknLlN_1733190154 cluster:ay36) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 03 Dec 2024 09:42:34 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:42:33 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] erofs: fix PSI memstall accounting To: Sandeep Dhavale , Max Kellermann Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, LKML References: <20241127085236.3538334-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com> From: Gao Xiang In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Sandeep, On 2024/12/3 05:52, Sandeep Dhavale wrote: > Looks good, > > Reviewed-by: Sandeep Dhavale Thanks for the review! Max Kellermann reported the similar issue can still be reproduced with this patch although I'm not sure if it's the same issue though. Hi Max, I think at least this patch resolves a recent regression, I guess we'd better to address it first. As for your reports, I think we might need more information about this, since I don't find more clues from the EROFS codebase itself. Thanks, Gao Xiang > > Thanks, > Sandeep.