mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Scott James Remnant <scott@canonical.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: can we move USB_DEVICEFS to non-embedded?
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 08:43:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6a2187b0907081743w61102ff4u75d15c2f3cae26d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970907081423v6d3830eey227f3d54b10382a6@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Dave Airlie<airlied@gmail.com> wrote:

> So I don't think CONFIG_EMBEDDED is correct at least at this point.

Without CONFIG_EMBEDDED ...
  CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y

With CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y ...
  # CONFIG_NAMESPACES is not set
  CONFIG_VMSPLIT_3G=y

I can't find a place to change these using menuconfig when EMBEDDED is selected.

I agree that CONFIG_EMBEDDED is not the right place to hide this
becuase it changed the behavior of more than just usbfs.

Thanks,
Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-09  0:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-23  5:11 Jeff Chua
2009-06-23  8:17 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-06-23 14:42 ` Greg KH
2009-06-23 15:29   ` Jeff Chua
2009-06-23 15:39     ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 10:54       ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-08 11:03         ` Kay Sievers
2009-07-08 11:20           ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-08 11:42             ` Scott James Remnant
2009-07-08 13:00             ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 13:52         ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 13:55           ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 14:04             ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 14:12               ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 14:56                 ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 15:05                   ` Peter Jones
2009-07-08 15:47                     ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 21:23                       ` Dave Airlie
2009-07-09  0:43                         ` Jeff Chua [this message]
2009-07-09  1:59                           ` Randy Dunlap
2009-07-09  2:31                             ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09  3:01                               ` Randy Dunlap
2009-07-09 12:12                                 ` Jeff Chua
2009-07-09  1:33                         ` Greg KH
2009-07-08 15:12               ` Bill Nottingham
2009-07-08 15:44                 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b6a2187b0907081743w61102ff4u75d15c2f3cae26d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=scott@canonical.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®