From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756132AbYKCO0g (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:26:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754311AbYKCO00 (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:26:26 -0500 Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.230]:55791 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754103AbYKCO0Z (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:26:25 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=IqhawHDQMSU9g7LXHRTp9LnfRAhmlVpRm/HVIzOheUcgR9OurDoYw816Nj1PBCMd5r gdDdAEXvFJUVV4MPOFLt1gU9nOMzgeYqlqMicxXL2QptMI0wCcmR2Usd+jyS/K9gQ0Ae PWNLuXmbau1KV/59OZv+1J4LkZcCLTL/QqoNo= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 09:26:24 -0500 From: "Bob Copeland" To: "Pavel Roskin" Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] [PATCH] ath5k: fix detection of jumbo frames Cc: jirislaby@gmail.com, ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com, michael+ath5k@stapelberg.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <1225719328.3575.9.camel@dv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1225652938-6244-1-git-send-email-me@bobcopeland.com> <1225719328.3575.9.camel@dv> X-Google-Sender-Auth: a2743ae5b0c2fa55 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Pavel Roskin wrote: > Thanks for catching it! Please mention rs_antenna in addition to > rs_more. > >> - rs->rs_antenna = rx_status->rx_status_0 & >> - AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_RECEIVE_ANTENNA; >> - rs->rs_more = rx_status->rx_status_0 & >> - AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_MORE; >> + rs->rs_antenna = AR5K_REG_MS(rx_status->rx_status_0, >> + AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_RECEIVE_ANTENNA); >> + rs->rs_more = AR5K_REG_MS(rx_status->rx_status_0, >> + AR5K_5210_RX_DESC_STATUS0_MORE); > > rs_more should be boolean. It would be better to use "!!" to calculate > rs_rate. No need to shift anything. As for rs_antenna, it's fine with ^^^^^^ I assume you meant rs_more again: rs_more = !!(rx_status_0 & ...) >> +#define AR5K_5212_RX_DESC_STATUS0_DECOMP_CRC_ERROR_S 13 > > This doesn't belong to the patch. It looks like it's another boolean > value, but it's not currently used. ACK, all valid. I'll respin. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com