From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753633AbYKYVaN (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:30:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752368AbYKYV35 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:29:57 -0500 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.169]:59276 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752295AbYKYV34 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:29:56 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=wXc9MPYdSpG7GukRgava5laG6jroj3pdGMA6vVBo4Rp5K86dbvib08aT/7Sv+l60/O Tud9YoR6v2FtN2fxsg3jcbD8hJLWi4yQ5uxeNsGOqaJIz4YwElp3JJJWmmKkgcXZaZ7E vc2nFhDsBDgxwfNS611qN802G55NFuoiccndQ= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 16:29:55 -0500 From: "Bob Copeland" To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: [ath5k-devel] License of changes to ath5k/ath9k Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, ath5k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, bkuhn@softwarefreedom.org In-Reply-To: <20081125210421.GF5950@tesla> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081125210421.GF5950@tesla> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7c858c72a73cb089 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > We'll keep using the ath5k Changes-licensed-under tag until we get > advice from SFLC if we have done enough to ensure this is no longer > necessary. For ath9k, if we are not sure if you have read the > "Developer's Certificate of Origin 1.1" we may ping you with an e-mail > just to be sure. I don't consider any of my changes significant enough to confer copyright, so by my Signed-off-by, I agree that whatever license the file currently has is alright by me. Even if the changes were significant, the previous holds. However, if everyone + SFLC prefers that we strictly use Changes-licensed-under even if we don't claim copyright, then I'll happily add the tag generator script to a git commit hook :) > Ps. Please do not open any can of worms here, this is just informational. Sure. I like the ath9k way, but really it doesn't matter that much. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com