From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, juri.lelli@arm.com
Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH V5 3/6] cpufreq: Remove cpufreq_governor_lock
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:31:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6c62d0e8fe230c90afbf389999c416e26ad5615.1455191663.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1455191663.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1455191663.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
We used to drop policy->rwsem just before calling __cpufreq_governor()
in some cases earlier and so it was possible that __cpufreq_governor()
runs concurrently via separate threads.
In order to guarantee valid state transitions for governors,
'governor_enabled' was required to be protected using some locking and
we created cpufreq_governor_lock for that.
But now, __cpufreq_governor() is always called from within policy->rwsem
held and so 'governor_enabled' is protected against races even without
cpufreq_governor_lock.
Get rid of the extra lock now.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Tested-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 --------
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 51fb47cd38a0..745da90d7b38 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -146,8 +146,6 @@ void cpufreq_update_util(u64 time, unsigned long util, unsigned long max)
rcu_read_unlock();
}
-DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_governor_lock);
-
/* Flag to suspend/resume CPUFreq governors */
static bool cpufreq_suspended;
@@ -2014,11 +2012,9 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_debug("%s: for CPU %u, event %u\n", __func__, policy->cpu, event);
- mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
if ((policy->governor_enabled && event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
|| (!policy->governor_enabled
&& (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS || event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP))) {
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
return -EBUSY;
}
@@ -2027,8 +2023,6 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
policy->governor_enabled = true;
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
-
ret = policy->governor->governor(policy, event);
if (!ret) {
@@ -2038,12 +2032,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
policy->governor->initialized--;
} else {
/* Restore original values */
- mutex_lock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP)
policy->governor_enabled = true;
else if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
policy->governor_enabled = false;
- mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_lock);
}
if (((event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT) && ret) ||
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
index 4e77efb7db67..02885e353dfc 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h
@@ -232,7 +232,6 @@ static inline int delay_for_sampling_rate(unsigned int sampling_rate)
}
extern struct mutex dbs_data_mutex;
-extern struct mutex cpufreq_governor_lock;
void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event);
void od_register_powersave_bias_handler(unsigned int (*f)
--
2.7.1.370.gb2aa7f8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-11 12:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-11 12:01 [PATCH V5 0/6] cpufreq: Locking fixes and cleanups Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 1/6] cpufreq: Merge cpufreq_offline_prepare/finish routines Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 2/6] cpufreq: Call __cpufreq_governor() with policy->rwsem held Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 4/6] cpufreq: governor: No need to manage state machine now Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 5/6] cpufreq: conservative: Update sample_delay_ns immediately Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 12:01 ` [PATCH V5 6/6] cpufreq: ondemand: Rearrange od_dbs_timer() to avoid updating delay Viresh Kumar
2016-02-11 22:17 ` [PATCH V5 0/6] cpufreq: Locking fixes and cleanups Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6c62d0e8fe230c90afbf389999c416e26ad5615.1455191663.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®