Re: [PATCH V2 net 2/4] net: fec: recycle pages for transmitted XDP frames

[Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>]

From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 01:54:04 +0000

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
>> Sent: 2023年7月6日 19:59
>> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
>> Cc: davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com; kuba@kernel.org;
>> pabeni@redhat.com; ast@kernel.org; daniel@iogearbox.net;
>> hawk@kernel.org; john.fastabend@gmail.com; Shenwei Wang
>> <shenwei.wang@nxp.com>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>;
>> netdev@vger.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>;
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net 2/4] net: fec: recycle pages for transmitted XDP
>> frames
>>
>> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
>> Date: Thu,  6 Jul 2023 16:10:10 +0800
>>
>>> From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
>>>
>>> Once the XDP frames have been successfully transmitted through the
>>> ndo_xdp_xmit() interface, it's the driver responsibility to free the
>>> frames so that the page_pool can recycle the pages and reuse them.
>>> However, this action is not implemented in the fec driver.
>>> This leads to a user-visible problem that the console will print the
>>> following warning log.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +				if (txq->tx_buf[i].xdp) {
>>> +					xdp_return_frame(txq->tx_buf[i].xdp);
>>> +					txq->tx_buf[i].xdp = NULL;
>>> +				}
>>> +
>>> +				/* restore default tx buffer type: FEC_TXBUF_T_SKB */
>>> +				txq->tx_buf[i].type = FEC_TXBUF_T_SKB;
>>
>> Here and in the related places below: maybe set ::type dynamically when
>> sending to either SKB or XDP instead of setting it only for XDP and then
>> restoring each time?
> I also considered this method. but when the skb has frags or needs to be TSO,
> only the last tx_buf of the skb needs to store the skb pointer, but all the tx_buf
> of the skb needs to set the type explicitly, I think it is a bit mess and not concise.
> So I restore the type to default when recycle the BDs. Anyway, it;s just a difference
> in implement, if you guys insist it's better to set the type explicitly, I will modify
> the patch. Thanks!

Just more of personal preference, no problems. Moreover, your
explanation makes sense to me.

>>
>>>  			}
>>> +
>>>  			bdp->cbd_bufaddr = cpu_to_fec32(0);
>>>  			bdp = fec_enet_get_nextdesc(bdp, &txq->bd);
>>>  		}
>> [...]
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Olek

Thanks,
Olek