From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, security@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] iommu/sva: Invalidate KVA range on kernel TLB flush
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2025 13:15:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6defa2a-164e-4c2f-ac55-fef5b4a9ba0f@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ce79c80-1fc8-4684-920a-c8d82c4c3dc8@intel.com>
On 8/7/25 23:31, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> +void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte)
>> +{
>> + struct page *page = virt_to_page(pte);
>> +
>> + guard(spinlock)(&kernel_pte_work.lock);
>> + list_add(&page->lru, &kernel_pte_work.list);
>> + schedule_work(&kernel_pte_work.work);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h b/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
>> index 3c8ec3bfea44..716ebab67636 100644
>> --- a/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
>> @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static inline pte_t
>> *pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
>> #define pte_alloc_one_kernel(...)
>> alloc_hooks(pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifndef __HAVE_ARCH_PTE_FREE_KERNEL
>> /**
>> * pte_free_kernel - free PTE-level kernel page table memory
>> * @mm: the mm_struct of the current context
>> @@ -55,6 +56,7 @@ static inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct
>> *mm, pte_t *pte)
>> {
>> pagetable_dtor_free(virt_to_ptdesc(pte));
>> }
>> +#endif
>>
>> /**
>> * __pte_alloc_one - allocate memory for a PTE-level user page table
> I'd much rather the arch-generic code looked like this:
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ASYNC_PGTABLE_FREE
> // code and struct here, or dump them over in some
> // other file and do this in a header
> #else
> static void pte_free_kernel_async(struct page *page) {}
> #endif
>
> void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte)
> {
> struct page *page = virt_to_page(pte);
>
> if (IS_DEFINED(CONFIG_ASYNC_PGTABLE_FREE)) {
> pte_free_kernel_async(page);
> else
> pagetable_dtor_free(page_ptdesc(page));
> }
>
> Then in Kconfig, you end up with something like:
>
> config ASYNC_PGTABLE_FREE
> def_bool y
> depends on INTEL_IOMMU_WHATEVER
>
> That very much tells much more of the whole story in code. It also gives
> the x86 folks that compile out the IOMMU the exact same code as the
> arch-generic folks. It_also_ makes it dirt simple and obvious for the
> x86 folks to optimize out the async behavior if they don't like it in
> the future by replacing the compile-time IOMMU check with a runtime one.
>
> Also, if another crazy IOMMU implementation comes along that happens to
> do what the x86 IOMMUs do, then they have a single Kconfig switch to
> flip. If they follow what this patch tries to do, they'll start by
> copying and pasting the x86 implementation.
I'll do it like this. Does that look good to you?
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
index 70d29b14d851..6f1113e024fa 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/iommu/Kconfig
@@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ config IOMMU_DMA
# Shared Virtual Addressing
config IOMMU_SVA
select IOMMU_MM_DATA
+ select ASYNC_PGTABLE_FREE if X86
bool
config IOMMU_IOPF
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h b/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
index 3c8ec3bfea44..dbddacdca2ce 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/pgalloc.h
@@ -46,6 +46,19 @@ static inline pte_t
*pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
#define pte_alloc_one_kernel(...)
alloc_hooks(pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(__VA_ARGS__))
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ASYNC_PGTABLE_FREE
+struct pgtable_free_work {
+ struct list_head list;
+ spinlock_t lock;
+ struct work_struct work;
+};
+extern struct pgtable_free_work kernel_pte_work;
+
+void pte_free_kernel_async(struct ptdesc *ptdesc);
+#else
+static inline void pte_free_kernel_async(struct ptdesc *ptdesc) {}
+#endif
+
/**
* pte_free_kernel - free PTE-level kernel page table memory
* @mm: the mm_struct of the current context
@@ -53,7 +66,12 @@ static inline pte_t
*pte_alloc_one_kernel_noprof(struct mm_struct *mm)
*/
static inline void pte_free_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm, pte_t *pte)
{
- pagetable_dtor_free(virt_to_ptdesc(pte));
+ struct ptdesc *ptdesc = virt_to_ptdesc(pte);
+
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ASYNC_PGTABLE_FREE))
+ pte_free_kernel_async(ptdesc);
+ else
+ pagetable_dtor_free(ptdesc);
}
/**
diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
index e443fe8cd6cf..528550cfa7fe 100644
--- a/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/mm/Kconfig
@@ -1346,6 +1346,13 @@ config LOCK_MM_AND_FIND_VMA
config IOMMU_MM_DATA
bool
+config ASYNC_PGTABLE_FREE
+ bool "Asynchronous kernel page table freeing"
+ help
+ Perform kernel page table freeing asynchronously. This is required
+ for systems with IOMMU Shared Virtual Address (SVA) to flush IOTLB
+ paging structure caches.
+
config EXECMEM
bool
diff --git a/mm/pgtable-generic.c b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
index 567e2d084071..6639ee6641d4 100644
--- a/mm/pgtable-generic.c
+++ b/mm/pgtable-generic.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#include <linux/swap.h>
#include <linux/swapops.h>
#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
+#include <linux/iommu.h>
#include <asm/pgalloc.h>
#include <asm/tlb.h>
@@ -406,3 +407,32 @@ pte_t *__pte_offset_map_lock(struct mm_struct *mm,
pmd_t *pmd,
pte_unmap_unlock(pte, ptl);
goto again;
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ASYNC_PGTABLE_FREE
+static void kernel_pte_work_func(struct work_struct *work);
+struct pgtable_free_work kernel_pte_work = {
+ .list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(kernel_pte_work.list),
+ .lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(kernel_pte_work.lock),
+ .work = __WORK_INITIALIZER(kernel_pte_work.work, kernel_pte_work_func),
+};
+
+static void kernel_pte_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct ptdesc *ptdesc, *next;
+
+ iommu_sva_invalidate_kva_range(0, TLB_FLUSH_ALL);
+
+ guard(spinlock)(&kernel_pte_work.lock);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(ptdesc, next, &kernel_pte_work.list, pt_list) {
+ list_del_init(&ptdesc->pt_list);
+ pagetable_dtor_free(ptdesc);
+ }
+}
+
+void pte_free_kernel_async(struct ptdesc *ptdesc)
+{
+ guard(spinlock)(&kernel_pte_work.lock);
+ list_add(&ptdesc->pt_list, &kernel_pte_work.list);
+ schedule_work(&kernel_pte_work.work);
+}
+#endif
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-08 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-06 5:25 Lu Baolu
2025-08-06 15:03 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-06 15:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-06 16:04 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-06 16:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-06 16:34 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-06 16:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-07 14:40 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-07 15:31 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-08 5:15 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2025-08-10 7:19 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-11 9:15 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-11 12:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-15 9:23 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-11 13:55 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-11 14:56 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-08-12 1:17 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-15 14:35 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-11 12:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-13 3:17 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-18 1:34 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-07 19:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-08 2:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 9:16 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 9:46 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-18 5:58 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 14:31 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-18 6:08 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-18 6:21 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-21 7:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-23 3:26 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-25 22:36 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-26 1:25 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-26 2:49 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-26 14:22 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-26 14:33 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-26 14:57 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-27 10:58 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-27 23:31 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-28 5:31 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-28 7:08 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-28 18:56 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-28 19:10 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 19:31 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-28 19:39 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-08-26 16:21 ` Dave Hansen
2025-08-27 6:34 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-08 5:08 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-07 6:53 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-14 4:48 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-15 7:48 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b6defa2a-164e-4c2f-ac55-fef5b4a9ba0f@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®