mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
To: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 10:22:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6df6923-1028-4a6e-8cf4-e10e8fd55475@ghiti.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513151631.3520793-1-namcao@linutronix.de>

On 13/05/2025 17:16, Nam Cao wrote:
> Add KUnit test for riscv kprobes, mostly for simulated instructions. The
> test install kprobes into multiple sample functions, and check that these
> functions still return the expected magic value.
>
> This test can detect some kprobe bugs reported in the past (in Link:).
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20241119111056.2554419-1-namcao@linutronix.de/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/stable/c7e463c0-8cad-4f4e-addd-195c06b7b6de@iscas.ac.cn/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230829182500.61875-1-namcaov@gmail.com/
> Signed-off-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
> ---
> v2: rewrite the auipc test so that clang can compile
>
>   arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug         |  12 +
>   arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile              |   1 +
>   arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/Makefile      |   1 +
>   .../kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S   | 229 ++++++++++++++++++
>   .../riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c |  56 +++++
>   .../riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h |  24 ++
>   6 files changed, 323 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/Makefile
>   create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S
>   create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c
>   create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug
> index 78cea5d2c270..5db4df44279e 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -30,6 +30,18 @@ config RISCV_MODULE_LINKING_KUNIT
>   
>            If unsure, say N.
>   
> +config RISCV_KPROBES_KUNIT
> +       bool "KUnit test for riscv kprobes" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +       depends on KUNIT
> +       depends on KPROBES
> +       default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> +       help
> +         Enable testing for riscv kprobes. Useful for riscv and/or kprobes
> +         development. The test verifies that kprobes do not change the behaviour
> +         of some sample functions.
> +
> +         If unsure, say N.
> +
>   endif # RUNTIME_TESTING_MENU
>   
>   endmenu # "arch/riscv/kernel runtime Testing"
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile
> index 7d6c76cffe20..407e7e6c28dc 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Makefile
> @@ -1 +1,2 @@
>   obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_MODULE_LINKING_KUNIT)	+= module_test/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_RISCV_KPROBES_KUNIT)		+= kprobes/
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4cb6c66a98e8
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +obj-y += test-kprobes.o test-kprobes-asm.o
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b951d0f12482
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S
> @@ -0,0 +1,229 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> +
> +#include <linux/linkage.h>
> +#include <asm/asm.h>
> +#include "test-kprobes.h"
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_add)
> +	li a1, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	li a2, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +test_kprobes_add_addr1:
> +	add a1, a1, a2
> +test_kprobes_add_addr2:
> +	add a0, a1, x0
> +	ret
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_add)
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_jal)
> +	li a0, 0
> +	mv a1, ra
> +	.option push
> +	.option norvc
> +test_kprobes_jal_addr1:
> +	jal x0, 2f
> +	ret
> +	.option pop
> +1:	li a0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	ret
> +	.option push
> +	.option norvc
> +test_kprobes_jal_addr2:
> +2:	jal 1b
> +	.option pop
> +	li a2, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +	add a0, a0, a2
> +	jr a1
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_jal)
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_jalr)
> +	la a0, 1f
> +	mv a1, ra
> +	.option push
> +	.option norvc
> +test_kprobes_jalr_addr:
> +	jalr a0
> +	.option pop
> +	li t0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	add a0, a0, t0
> +	jr a1
> +1:	li a0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +	ret
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_jalr)
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_auipc)
> +test_kprobes_auipc_addr:
> +	auipc a0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +	la a1, test_kprobes_auipc_addr
> +	sub a0, a0, a1
> +	srli a0, a0, 12
> +	li a1, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	add a0, a0, a1
> +	ret
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_auipc)
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_branch)
> +	.option push
> +	.option norvc
> +	li a0, 0
> +	li a1, 1
> +	li a2, 2
> +test_kprobes_branch_addr1:
> +	beqz a0, 1f
> +	ret
> +1:
> +test_kprobes_branch_addr2:
> +	beqz a1, 3f
> +test_kprobes_branch_addr3:
> +	bnez a0, 3f
> +test_kprobes_branch_addr4:
> +	bnez a2, 1f
> +	ret
> +1:
> +test_kprobes_branch_addr5:
> +	bge a1, a2, 3f
> +test_kprobes_branch_addr6:
> +	bge a2, a1, 2f
> +	ret
> +1:
> +	li t0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	add a0, a0, t0
> +	ret
> +2:
> +test_kprobes_branch_addr7:
> +	blt a2, a1, 3f
> +	li a0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +test_kprobes_branch_addr8:
> +	blt a1, a2, 1b
> +3:
> +	li a0, 0
> +	ret
> +	.option pop
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_branch)
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_c_j)
> +	li a0, 0
> +test_kprobes_branch_c_j_addr1:
> +	c.j 2f
> +1:
> +	li a1, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	add a0, a0, a1
> +	ret
> +2:	li a0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +test_kprobes_branch_c_j_addr2:
> +	c.j 1b
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_c_j)
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_c_jr)
> +	la a0, 2f
> +test_kprobes_c_jr_addr1:
> +	c.jr a0
> +	ret
> +1:	li a1, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +	add a0, a0, a1
> +	ret
> +2:
> +	li a0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	la a1, 1b
> +test_kprobes_c_jr_addr2:
> +	c.jr a1
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_c_jr)
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_c_jalr)
> +	mv a1, ra
> +	la a0, 1f
> +test_kprobes_c_jalr_addr:
> +	c.jalr a0
> +	li a2, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	add a0, a0, a2
> +	jr a1
> +1:	li a0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +	ret
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_c_jalr)
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_c_beqz)
> +	li a0, 0
> +	li a1, 1
> +test_kprobes_c_beqz_addr1:
> +	c.beqz a0, 2f
> +	ret
> +1:	li a1, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	add a0, a0, a1
> +	ret
> +test_kprobes_c_beqz_addr2:
> +2:	c.beqz a1, 3f
> +	li a0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +	mv a1, x0
> +test_kprobes_c_beqz_addr3:
> +	c.beqz a1, 1b
> +3:	li a0, 0
> +	ret
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_c_beqz)
> +
> +SYM_FUNC_START(test_kprobes_c_bnez)
> +	li a0, 0
> +	li a1, 1
> +test_kprobes_c_bnez_addr1:
> +	c.bnez a1, 2f
> +	ret
> +1:	li a1, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER
> +	add a0, a0, a1
> +	ret
> +test_kprobes_c_bnez_addr2:
> +2:	c.bnez a0, 3f
> +	li a0, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER
> +test_kprobes_c_bnez_addr3:
> +	c.bnez a0, 1b
> +3:	li a0, 0
> +	ret
> +SYM_FUNC_END(test_kprobes_c_bnez)
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C */
> +
> +SYM_DATA_START(test_kprobes_addresses)
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_add_addr1
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_add_addr2
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_jal_addr1
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_jal_addr2
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_jalr_addr
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_auipc_addr
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_addr1
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_addr2
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_addr3
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_addr4
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_addr5
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_addr6
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_addr7
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_addr8
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_c_j_addr1
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch_c_j_addr2
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_jr_addr1
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_jr_addr2
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_jalr_addr
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_beqz_addr1
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_beqz_addr2
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_beqz_addr3
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_bnez_addr1
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_bnez_addr2
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_bnez_addr3
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C */
> +	RISCV_PTR 0
> +SYM_DATA_END(test_kprobes_addresses)
> +
> +SYM_DATA_START(test_kprobes_functions)
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_add
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_jal
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_jalr
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_auipc
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_branch
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_j
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_jr
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_jalr
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_beqz
> +	RISCV_PTR test_kprobes_c_bnez
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_C */
> +	RISCV_PTR 0
> +SYM_DATA_END(test_kprobes_functions)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6f6cdfbf5a95
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/kprobes.h>
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +#include "test-kprobes.h"
> +
> +static int kprobe_dummy_handler(struct kprobe *kp, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_kprobe_riscv(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	unsigned int num_kprobe = 0;
> +	long (*func)(void);
> +	struct kprobe *kp;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	while (test_kprobes_addresses[num_kprobe])
> +		num_kprobe++;
> +
> +	kp = kcalloc(num_kprobe, sizeof(*kp), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, kp);
> +	if (!kp)
> +		return;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_kprobe; ++i) {
> +		kp[i].addr = test_kprobes_addresses[i];
> +		kp[i].pre_handler = kprobe_dummy_handler;
> +		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, register_kprobe(&kp[i]));


Will kp be freed if the test fails?


> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0;; ++i) {
> +		func = test_kprobes_functions[i];
> +		if (!func)
> +			break;
> +		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC, func(), "function %d broken", i);
> +	}
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_kprobe; ++i)
> +		unregister_kprobe(&kp[i]);
> +	kfree(kp);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case kprobes_testcases[] = {
> +	KUNIT_CASE(test_kprobe_riscv),
> +	{}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite kprobes_test_suite = {
> +	.name = "kprobes_test_riscv",
> +	.test_cases = kprobes_testcases,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suites(&kprobes_test_suite);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3886ab491ecb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+ */
> +#ifndef TEST_KPROBES_H
> +#define TEST_KPROBES_H
> +
> +/*
> + * The magic value that all the functions in the test_kprobes_functions array return. The test
> + * installs kprobes into these functions, and verify that the functions still correctly return this
> + * value.
> + */
> +#define KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC          0xcafebabe
> +#define KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_LOWER    0x0000babe
> +#define KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC_UPPER    0xcafe0000
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +/* array of addresses to install kprobes */
> +extern void *test_kprobes_addresses[];
> +
> +/* array of functions that return KPROBE_TEST_MAGIC */
> +extern long (*test_kprobes_functions[])(void);
> +
> +#endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> +
> +#endif /* TEST_KPROBES_H */


Other than that, you can add:

Tested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>

I'll merge it for 6.16.

Thanks for adding new tests, KUnit tests do not run yet in the CI but 
I'll add them soon!

Alex


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-14  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-13 15:16 Nam Cao
2025-05-14  8:22 ` Alexandre Ghiti [this message]
2025-05-14 10:01   ` Nam Cao
2025-06-04 14:33 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2025-09-26 11:51 ` Thomas Huth
2025-09-26 12:14   ` Nam Cao
2025-09-29 10:19     ` Nam Cao
2025-10-10 22:03       ` Paul Walmsley
2025-10-13  5:15         ` Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b6df6923-1028-4a6e-8cf4-e10e8fd55475@ghiti.fr \
    --to=alex@ghiti.fr \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=namcao@linutronix.de \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®