From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <hps@intermeta.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Strange e1000
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 08:41:11 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b6m4r7$rp1$2@tangens.hometree.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030404181400.GA26545@gtf.org>
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> writes:
>On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 07:49:28PM +0530, Abhishek Agrawal wrote:
>> On Fri, 2003-04-04 at 19:11, Paul Rolland wrote:
>>
>> > Could it be possible that the 1000MBps FD on the e1000 side is
>> > a local configuration, and that it needs some time to discuss with
>> > the Netgear switch to negotiate correctly speed and duplex before
>> > working correctly ? (i.e. 20 sec = negotiation time)
>> Autoneg must be completed within 2 sec, or else it is considered as
>> failed.
>If we follow this rule, we have lots of Cisco and other network gear
>that will not be able to communicate with Linux.
2 seconds sound like "spanning-tree portfast" in Cisco-speak. 20
seconds sounds like normal configuration. Both are legal and work with
normal FE gear. It might be possible that you must deactivate
spanning-tree if you don't connect a switch.
I personally found the 20 second break always annoying so I routinely
disable it on my catalysts. :-)
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
hps@intermeta.de +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-05 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-04 7:25 Michael Knigge
2003-04-04 13:41 ` Paul Rolland
2003-04-04 14:00 ` Michael Knigge
2003-04-04 14:19 ` Abhishek Agrawal
2003-04-04 18:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-05 8:41 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen [this message]
2003-04-04 14:45 ` Justin Cormack
2003-04-04 15:48 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-04-04 17:02 ` Patrick R. McManus
2003-04-04 17:09 ` Patrick R. McManus
2003-04-07 7:45 ` Strange e1000 - SOLVED Michael Knigge
2003-04-07 21:52 Strange e1000 Mroczek, Joseph T
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='b6m4r7$rp1$2@tangens.hometree.net' \
--to=hps@intermeta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®